-6x + 12 , can somebody explain this ?

Answer:

#1 is the answere

Step-by-step explanation:

Check the sides

Answer:

the time taken for the radioactive element to decay to 1 g is 304.8 s.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

half-life of the given Dubnium = 34 s

initial mass of the given Dubnium, m₀ = 500 grams

final mass of the element, mf = 1 g

The time taken for the radioactive element to decay to its final mass is calculated as follows;

[tex]1 = 500 (0.5)^{\frac{t}{34}} \\\\\frac{1}{500} = (0.5)^{\frac{t}{34}}\\\\log(\frac{1}{500}) = log [(0.5)^{\frac{t}{34}}]\\\\log(\frac{1}{500}) = \frac{t}{34} log(0.5)\\\\-2.699 = \frac{t}{34} (-0.301)\\\\t = \frac{2.699 \times 34}{0.301} \\\\t = 304.8 \ s[/tex]

Therefore, the time taken for the radioactive element to decay to 1 g is 304.8 s.

The time required to decay 500 grams to 1 gram is 304.8 seconds and this can be determined by using the given data.

Given :

Dubnium-262 has a half-life of 34 s.

Final mass = 1 gram

Initial mass = 500 gram

Time taken by a radioactive element to decay is:

[tex]1 = 500(0.5)^{\frac{t}{34}}[/tex]

Simplify the above equation.

[tex]\rm \dfrac{1}{500} = (0.5)^{\frac{t }{34}}[/tex]

Now, take the log on both sides in the above equation.

[tex]\rm log(0.002 ) = \dfrac{t}{34}\times log(0.5)[/tex]

[tex]\rm \dfrac{log(0.002)}{log(0.5)} \times 34 = t[/tex]

t = 304.8 sec

So, the time required to decay 500 grams to 1 gram is 304.8 seconds.

For more information, refer to the link given below:

https://brainly.com/question/13911928

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

p(3) = 2³ = 8

p(2) = 2² = 4

8-4 = 4

Answer:

[tex]x^{\frac{5}{3} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{2}{3} *\frac{5}{2} \\\\\frac{5}{3}[/tex]

The probability that a randomly selected student scores more than 82% on the physics test, we can use the standard normal distribution and the given mean and standard deviation.

The z-score formula is given by z = (x - μ) / σ, where z represents the z-score, x is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. In this case, the observed value is 82%, the mean is 75%, and the standard deviation is 6.5%. Plugging these values into the formula, we calculate the z-score as z = (0.82 - 0.75) / 0.065 = 1.0769.

Next, we need to find the area to the left of the z-score in the standard normal distribution table or using a calculator. The area to the left of 1.0769 corresponds to the probability of scoring less than 82%. Let's assume this area is P(z < 1.0769).

The probability of scoring more than 82%, we subtract P(z < 1.0769) from 1: P(z > 1.0769) = 1 - P(z < 1.0769).

Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find P(z < 1.0769) to determine the probability.

To learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The mean of the given probability distribution is 2.4.

To find the mean of a probability distribution, we multiply each value of x by its corresponding probability and then sum them up. Using the provided data:

x: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4

P(x): 0.0017, 0.3421, 0.065, 0.4106, 0.1806

mean = 0(0.0017) + 1(0.3421) + 2(0.065) + 3(0.4106) + 4(0.1806)

     = 0 + 0.3421 + 0.13 + 1.2318 + 0.7224

     = 2.4263

Therefore, the mean of the given probability distribution is approximately 2.4 (rounded to one decimal place).

To learn more about probability distribution: https://brainly.com/question/23286309

#SPJ11

The equivalence of the expressions n × ([tex]{}^{(n-1)}C_2[/tex]) and [tex]{}^nC_2[/tex] × (n − 2) has been proven mathematically.

To prove the equivalence of the expressions n × ([tex]{}^{(n-1)}C_2[/tex]) and [tex]^{n}C_2[/tex] × (n − 2), we can demonstrate that they yield the same result.

First, let's simplify each expression:

n × ([tex]{}^{(n-1)}C_2[/tex]) = n × [(n-1)! / 2!(n-1-2)!]

= n × [(n-1)! / 2!(n-3)!]

= n × [(n-1)(n-2) / 2]

= n × (n² - 3n + 2) / 2

= (n³ - 3n² + 2n) / 2

[tex]{}^nC_2[/tex] × (n − 2) = [n! / 2!(n-2)!] × (n-2)

= [n! / 2!(n-2)!] × (n-2)

= [(n)(n-1)(n-2)! / 2!(n-2)!] × (n-2)

= [(n)(n-1)] / 2

= (n² - n) / 2

By comparing the two simplified expressions, we can see that (n³ - 3n² + 2n) / 2 is equal to (n² - n) / 2.

Hence, we have proven that n × ([tex]{}^{(n-1)}C_2[/tex]) is equivalent to [tex]{}^nC_2[/tex] × (n − 2).

Learn more about equivalency at

https://brainly.com/question/14672772

#SPJ4

Answer:

y=5(x-2)+3 or y= 5x+7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8 oz of cocacola drink containing caffeine

8 oz of Decaffeinated Coke

Step-by-step explanation:

Th independent variables is that variable which causes a change in the output or the dependent or response variable. In the scenario described above, the type of drink Given to the participants is the independent variable

The Independent variable is the type of drink Given to the subjects with two levels ;

Levels :

cocacola drink containing caffeine

Decaffeinated Coke

Therefore, we can conclude that, there are two levels Of the jndependent variable, which are stated above.

The α = 0.01 level of significance, we can conclude that the average alcohol consumption of college students is significantly higher than that of the average American population.

To determine if the average alcohol consumption of college students is significantly different from the average consumption of the average American, we can conduct a hypothesis test.

Let's set up the hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The average alcohol consumption of college students is equal to the average American consumption. (μ = 81)

Alternative hypothesis (H1): The average alcohol consumption of college students is greater than the average American consumption. (μ > 81)

We can use a one-sample t-test to analyze the data. Since we don't have information about the population standard deviation, we'll use the t-distribution and the sample standard deviation instead.

Given that the sample mean (x) of the 10 randomly selected college students is 97.7 liters and the sample standard deviation (s) is 23 liters, we can calculate the t-statistic using the following formula:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

Where:

x = sample mean

μ = population mean

s = sample standard deviation

n = sample size

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (97.7 - 81) / (23 / √10)

Calculating this expression gives us the t-value.

However, we also need to determine the critical value for the test based on the significance level (α = 0.01) and the degrees of freedom = n - 1.

Since we have 10 randomly selected college students = 10 - 1 = 9.

To find the critical value, we can consult the t-distribution table. With α = 0.01 and df = 9, the critical t-value is approximately 2.821.

Comparing the calculated t-value to the critical t-value, we can draw a conclusion. If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Now let's calculate the t-value:

t = (97.7 - 81) / (23 / √10)

≈ 16.700

Since the calculated t-value (16.700) is much greater than the critical t-value (2.821), we can reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, based on the given data and the α = 0.01 level of significance, we can conclude that the average alcohol consumption of college students is significantly higher than that of the average American population.

Learn more about hypothesis test click;

https://brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

Solution :

It is given that four different prizes were awarded. So,

a). 4 ways for person 47 to win a prize

     99 ways to give out the 2nd prize

     98 ways to give the 3rd prize

      97 ways to give the last prize

     ∴  P(99,3) = 99 x 98 x 97

b). 1 way to give person 47 their prize

    1 way to give person 19 their prize

    98 ways to give out the 3rd prize

    97 ways to give out the last prize

    So, P(98,2) = 98 x 97

In the lexicographic ordering of the permutations of the set {A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H} , the next permutation after GAEDBHFC will be GAEDBHFD.

What is lexicographic ordering?

Lexicographic ordering or dictionary ordering is a way of ordering elements based on their alphabetical or numerical values.

To find the next permutation in the lexicographic ordering, we need to find the smallest possible permutation that is greater than GAEDBHFC by considering the order of the letters.

Let's analyze the given permutation:

GAEDBHFC

To find the next permutation, we start from right to left and look for the first occurrence of a letter that can be replaced by a greater letter. In this case, the first such occurrence is "C" (after "H").

Next, we need to find the smallest letter that is greater than "C" from the remaining letters. From the letters {C, D, E, F, G, H}, the smallest greater letter than "C" is "D".

Now, we swap "C" with "D":

GAEDBHFD

After swapping, we need to sort the remaining letters in ascending order to obtain the smallest permutation. The remaining letters are {B, E, F, G, H}. Sorting them gives:

GAEDBHFD

Therefore, the next permutation after GAEDBHFC is GAEDBHFD.

The correct answer is:

b. GAEDBHFD

To know more about permutations, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29990226

#SPJ4

Answer:

no don't ever click on links okay.

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean of the heights of Wendigos ≈ 302.523 cm, and the standard deviation ≈ 14.165 cm.

To obtain the mean and standard deviation of the heights of Wendigos, we can use the information given about the percentiles.

Let's denote the mean as μ and the standard deviation as σ.

Step 1: Finding the Z-scores

First, we need to find the Z-scores corresponding to the given percentiles.

For the lower percentile:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = -1.880

For the upper percentile:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = 1.880

Step 2: Finding the corresponding values using Z-scores

Next, we need to find the values corresponding to the Z-scores using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

For the lower percentile:

Z = -1.880 corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.0359

For the upper percentile:

Z = 1.880 corresponds to a cumulative probability of 0.9601

Step 3: Calculating the values

Using the cumulative probabilities obtained, we can find the corresponding values.

For the lower percentile:

X = Z * σ + μ

273 = -1.880 * σ + μ

For the upper percentile:

X = Z * σ + μ

326.25 = 1.880 * σ + μ

Step 4: Solving the equations

We now have a system of equations with two unknowns (μ and σ).

273 = -1.880 * σ + μ   (Equation 1)

326.25 = 1.880 * σ + μ   (Equation 2)

We can solve this system of equations to find the values of μ and σ.

Subtracting Equation 1 from Equation 2, we get:

326.25 - 273 = 1.880 * σ + μ - (-1.880 * σ + μ)

53.25 = 3.760 * σ

Dividing both sides by 3.760, we get:

σ ≈ 14.165

Substituting this value of σ into Equation 1, we can solve for μ:

273 = -1.880 * 14.165 + μ

273 + 1.880 * 14.165 = μ

μ ≈ 302.523

Therefore, mean is approximately 302.523 cm, and the standard deviation is approximately 14.165 cm.

To know more about standard deviation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13498201#

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

False

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Stefan spent 108.9$ and made 12.1$

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey I'm Aiden I can help you, I will take Brainlest, Your welcome :)

take 10% of 121 and subtract it from 121 and you get the price he paid and made

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]ei = \sqrt{ {45}^{2} - {27}^{2} } = \\ = \sqrt{2025 - 729} = \\ = \sqrt{1296} = \\ = 36[/tex]

Answer: $3.60 per case

Step-by-step explanation: $21.60 divided by 6 = 3.60

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) 9.80- 98/10

b) 7.3- 73/10

a) 7/100- 0.07

b) 82/10- 8.2

Hope this helps

Fraction:

a) 98/100

b) 73/10

Decimal:

a) 0.07

b) 8.2

The potential function for the given field is f = ln |y| - ln |z| - ln |x| + C, where C is a constant of integration.

Given field is F = (-1/x) i+ (1/y) j- (1/z) k

The potential function f is given by

∂f/∂x = -1/x .........(1)∂f/∂y = 1/y .........(2)∂f/∂z = -1/z .........(3)

Using the equation (1)

we get

f = -ln |x| + C1

Using the equation (2)

we get

f = ln |y| + C2

Using equation (3) we get

f = -ln |z| + C3

On adding the above three equations we get

f = ln |y| - ln |z| - ln |x| + C

where C = C1 + C2 + C3 is a constant of integration.

Therefore, the potential function for the given field is f = ln |y| - ln |z| - ln |x| + C, where C is a constant of integration.

To know more about the potential function, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/30098140

#SPJ11

Answer:

4.2 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Martina runs 6 miles in 50 minutes, we have to find the rate at which she is running. Put it in a fraction [tex]\frac{6}{50}[/tex] or she runs 6 miles every 50 minutes. When we divide we get that she is running, 0.12 miles evrey minute. The question askes us how far Matina will run in 35 minutes, so we multiply 0.12 by 35, and we get that she will run 4.2 miles.

The price at which twenty percent of the BBQs would cost more is $542 and it follows a normal distribution.

In this case, we are given that the price of BBQs at a large hardware store follows a normal distribution with a mean of $500 and a standard deviation of $50. We want to find the price at which twenty percent of the BBQs would cost more.

To solve this problem, we need to find the value, denoted as x, for which 20% of the BBQs are priced higher. This can be done by finding the z-score corresponding to the 20th percentile and then converting it back to the original scale.

The z-score is calculated using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ,

where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

To find the z-score corresponding to the 20th percentile, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator. The z-score corresponding to the 20th percentile is approximately -0.84.

Now we can use the z-score to find the corresponding value in the original scale:

-0.84 = (x - 500) / 50.

Solving for x, we get:

-0.84 * 50 = x - 500,

-42 = x - 500,

x = 500 - 42,

x = 458.

So, twenty percent of the BBQs would cost more than $458. However, since we need to choose from the given options, the closest price to $458 is $459.

Therefore, the answer is $459.

To know more about normal distribution, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31327019#

#SPJ11

Answer:

It is not factorable

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression is not factorable with rational numbers.

Answer:

This is not factorable.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is not factorable.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Professional dancers cause I’ve danced since I was 3 and I’ve always wanted to do it. And I wanna model on the side

Answer:

Detective/Forensics scientist

Step-by-step explanation:

I want to be a detective/ forensic scientist because I am interested in science and investigating.

Answer:

Werid I don’t know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

hgfxjdt

Step-by-step explanation:

This paper will discuss the mathematics involved in determining the least mark that Jethro needs to get for the last test in order to end up with a mean mark of 77 over all 6 tests.

Jethro has sat 5 tests and each test was marked out of 100. Therefore, Jethro’s marks for the 5 tests can be represented by x1, x2, x3, x4, and x5. Jethro’s mean mark for the 5 tests is 74, which can be represented by the mathematical equation: (x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5) / 5 = 74.

Jethro needs to sit one more test that is also marked out of 100 and he wants his mean mark for all 6 tests to be at least 77. Therefore, the least mark that Jethro needs to get for the last test can be found by rearranging the equation to: (x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6) / 6 = 77. This can be written in its simplified form as: 6x6 = 77(x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5).

In order to find the least mark that Jethro needs to get for the last test, x6, the other terms must be known. Since Jethro has already sat the 5 tests the marks for these tests are known, so they can be added together. This results in: x6 = 77(x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5) / 6. Therefore, Jethro needs to get a mark of at least 77.6 (rounded to the nearest tenth) on the last test in order to end up with a mean mark of 77.

The probability that it will not snow on January 1st in that town in a given year is 0.815.

Based on the meteorological records, A probability forecast includes a numerical expression of uncertainty about the quantity or event being forecast. Ideally, all elements (temperature, wind, precipitation, etc.)

The probability that it will not snow in a certain town on January 1st in a given year is 0.815. Here's how to arrive at the answer:Given that the probability of snowing on January 1st in that town is 0.185. Then, the probability of not snowing on January 1st is 1 - 0.185 = 0.815.

To know more about probability:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The given information probability of it not snowing on January 1st of a given year in that town is 0.815.

Therefore, the probability of it not snowing on January 1st of a given year in that town is 0.815.

Here's how to solve the problem: Given: The probability of it snowing on January 1st of a given year in that town is 0.185. The complement of the probability of it snowing on January 1st is the probability of it not snowing on January 1st of a given year in that town, which is:

P(not snowing on January 1st) = 1 - P(snowing on January 1st)

P(not snowing on January 1st) = 1 - 0.185

P(not snowing on January 1st) = 0.815

Therefore, the probability of it not snowing on January 1st of a given year in that town is 0.815.

To know more about probability visit

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11