Answer:
yes
Explanation:
as a parent , we know how your child acts and talks and when theirs changes in that. even if child may think other wise. social media is used by many people to hide behind a screen and spread more gossip faster
HELP. WORTH 25 POINTS!
Struggling in quicksand creates a vacuum, which causes a person to sink. But the human body is more buoyant in quicksand than it is in fresh or ocean water, meaning that it is actually easier to float on quicksand than it is in a pool or the ocean. _after_ falling into quicksand, a person should slowly spread-eagle and allow the body to gradually come to a back-floating position. By moving cautiously in this position, the quicksand victim can then maneuver back to solid ground and out of danger.
A. after
B. instance
C. lastly
D. on the other hand
Answer:
I don't need brainliest I just wanna say you got this you matter and don't let anyone bring you down
Explanation:
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Answer:
1 after, 2 during, 3 before
Explanation:
hope it helps.
if its right please mark me brainliest
Which subject and verb are in agreement?
A. Chefs/cooks
B. Cars/drive
C. Student/sits
D. Flowers/grow
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Find two examples of Sound Devices in the poem "David's Old Soul." Thanks.
Answer: The figurative language here ( ‘A tree my baby brothers could lean on’ and ‘the raft that helps carry them over this life’s rough rivers’) Tells me that the writer of this poem is needed to be a ‘breadwinner’ for the family. This can be enforced by the fact that the poem states the family only consists of ‘Mom and us kids’, The author is now tasked with duties such as caring for his baby brothers once his mother is no longer able to. Families without 2 parental figures is normally very straining to the kids and the single parent, only the strongest can withstand the onslaught of caring for kids. Thus letting me know that the meaning of this poem is that family needs to be there for each other because no one else would.
Explanation:
Kristi analyzed the following paragraph.
Koalas, the cuddly looking animals from eastern Australia, live in eucalyptus trees. When not climbing or napping in the trees, they are eating the leaves. A mother koala carries her baby for about six months in a pouch, much as a kangaroo mother carries her young. When the infant is old enough to come out of the mother’s pouch, it hangs on to her belly or catches a ride on her back.
Which detail from the text supports Kristi’s analysis that koalas are a unique kind of mammal?
A.
Koalas are cuddly looking animals.
B.
Koalas climb eucalyptus trees and eat the leaves.
C.
Infants are carried in the mother’s pouch for six months.
D.
The baby hangs on to the mother’s belly and rides on her back.
The text that supports koalas are a unique kind of mammal is Koalas climb eucalyptus trees and eat the leaves. So, it's B.
What do you mean by Mammals?Mammals may be defined as any member of the class of vertebrate animals in which the young are nurtured with milk from unique mammary glands.
Koalas are a uniques kind of mammal in the characteristics that they climb tall eucalyptus trees and eat their leavs.
Therefore, option B is correct.
To learn more about Mammals, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/935140
#SPJ2
What is the CER in the story Superman and me?
Answer:
CER? Can u clarify?
Explanation:
Which is the most accurate generalization that can be made about this
passage?
A)
Sojourner Truth believes that women should have
equal rights to men.
B)
Sojourner Truth believes that she is a woman equal
to all other women.
C)
Sojourner Truth does not want to upset anyone with
her personal beliefs.
D)
Sojourner Truth lists all the ways that she's been
mistreated and abused.
Answer:
its A)
Sojourner Truth believes that women should have
equal rights to men.
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
which answer choice is it?
Answer:
Whats the question?
Explanation:
When you tell me look in the comments for anwser!
What is the main image in Williams’s “This Is Just to Say”?
plums
breakfast
the kitchen
the icebox
eating
sweetness
Answer: Plums
Explanation: Edg 2020
does this make sense ??
Marketing to youth
Under-aged marketing is a cheap tactic to get kids to ask their parents either for money or for products regarding the advertisement they previously saw.
For the rest of these paragraphs let me get something clear when I use the words "kid" or "children," I am referring to any individual under the age of thirteen. I recognize this may be prejudice but it is generally considered that after the age of thirteen you are no longer a child; instead, a youth or a teenager.
The reasons I have boldly claimed that "under-aged marketing is a cheap tactic," is quite apparent and obvious when you put this under the imaginary common-sense microscope; let me elaborate. I will state the main points and then we can more closely examine them under this microscope
My statements:
"Kids don't have enough life experience to determine whether an ad or promotion is misleading."
"Kids generally do not have much disposable income, or income to speak of"
"Kids are used as a middle ground between marketing teams and their parent's money"
So, let's break this down; the first statement, what this is trying to mean is that kids have, unlike adults, not had enough life experience to determine whether a product is trustworthy. From prior experience most adults should be able to tell if a product is trustworthy, if the product is of enough quality, and even chose between products; consider diminishing returns (the concept that after a certain price products do not get better.) Kids lack this skill because they have simply not had enough life experience. Obviously, there can be exceptions to this, kids can have had enough experience, and there are adults that may not have enough experience to decern with this judgment; but to make it simple it is more or less universally accepted that people over the age of thirteen may already possess most or at least a bit of this judgment.
The second statement, this statement refers to how for many reasons, child labor laws included, children even over the age of thirteen may not be able to have a job. What this means is that children do not have a steady income of their own.
The second statement and the third statement fall under the same category and have the same finality; getting to the parents' wallet. This is usually the most controversial part of a subject like this, in the end, all that the marketing teams want is their money, they don't care how they get. If kids don't have money where can they get it from, the answer to that question is their parents.
So, in all this what the marketing teams are doing is getting to the parent's wallets. In doing so they are using their kids as a medium, if you will get to whom the ads were initially intended to get money from the parents.
All of this happens because children cannot differentiate between products. Saving the explanation from paragraph four, children do not have sufficient life experience for this, making them rely on their parents or other people, and use their parent’s money to buy them the product.
Some people might argue that all this just gives children more say in everything and allows them to see more of their choices. While to a certain extent this may be correct, yet again, children cannot properly and sufficiently decide for themselves what is best. Let me give a simple unconventional example. Little jimmy is innocently on the computer, watching his toy unboxing videos; when suddenly a mid-roll ad (advertisement in the middle of a video) starts to play. Jimmy is four years old and knows how to press the skip ad button but is suddenly entranced by an ad about cereal. This cereal claims to be the best serial in town, and that it tastes amazing. Little Jimmy had never heard about this brand but because the brand spent millions of dollars promoting it on various sites, it got to little jimmy who wanted nothing to do with cereal, to begin with. Little Jimmy thinks nothing of it, but it has not been forgotten. Next time little Jimmy goes to the supermarket with his dad, Big jimmy, for comedic effect. Big Jimmy and little Jimmy finally arrive at the cereal aisle, and little Jimmy recalls to his dad the ad he saw, claiming, “I WANT THAT CEREAL;” at this point, the ad has done its job. It got big Jimmy to buy his son the box of cereal that cost ten times as much just because it had a mascot and a catchy name; the cereal didn’t even taste that good, but they bought it. That my friend is how advertisements work, kids do not ponder upon such egregious things.
So, after this long-winded real-world example, it just goes to show you that people that think advertisements will broaden children’s spectrum and opinions on various products, it does not; whatsoever. It just makes the company more money; because more people buy.
In conclusion, children do not have enough real-world prowess to adequately choose for themselves (with some exceptions) what product is better, they will go directly to the one most advertised.
Answer:
Yes, I think it actually makes a lot of sense. Especially with your example!
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, it does make sense. Good job!
Explanation:
Plz help! I give Brainliest!
Can someone describe being on TV using sensory language and imagery.
Answer:
I was sitting on a leather chair with a talk show host. I could remember the seat cushion and feel how firm it was. I had to sit up straight. We had to smile the whole time we were on the show and the host would ask me basic questions to start a conversation. I would occasionally have to look into the camera but not too much because it would look like everything was word for word and there was bad acting. There was huge screens everywhere, a massive crew holding up cameras and microphones. The whole thing was staged with a script to use as a guide while we were on the show and seemed like a long interview that was broadcasted across a huge streaming service.
Explanation:
What is the central idea of the sentences?
It is not easy to avoid those closest to us.
Time does not affect one's overall appearance.
Reunions awaken memories and emotions.
It is possible to remember childhood events.
The central idea of the passage is that meetings awaken memories and emotions, as shown in the third answer option.
We can arrive at this answer because:
The narrator of the text shows how to find a person she has not seen for a long time, awakened memories that are very dear to the narrator.These memories, made the two girls feel very happy to be reunited, to the point of making them cry with emotion, for being able to see each other again.With this, we can see that the narrator is in favor of the idea of bringing people together, as he thinks these meetings arouse memories and emotions.
More information on what is the central idea of a text on the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1914191
What is the most important event that happened in chapter 9 of the book, The outsiders and why?
Answer:
Dally excitedly tells Johnny the news about the rumble, but Johnny replies, "Useless fighting's no good." Dally then tells Johnny how proud everyone is of his actions at the fire, and Johnny's eyes glow. Johnny musters the strength to say one last thing, to Ponyboy: "Stay gold, Ponyboy. Stay gold." He dies.
Explanation:
who wan.na cha..t 2+2 if you sovle your co.ol
Answer:
4
Explanation:
mark me as brainliest and follow and like me
Answer:
4 or baby 2
Explanation:
yeah thats right
What surprised both union men and factory owners about the strike?
Answer:
The thing which surprised both union men and factory owners about the strike is that: The women could work together and stand up for their rights themselves. Explanation: ... The strike was called by Clara Lemlich who headed the female garment workers to hold a separate strike.Jun 17, 2019
Explanation: itried hope it helps a little
《Help》
What do we gain from watching media that do not present a universal truth?
A. A better idea of how we should look and feel
B. An expanded knowledge of the world around us
c. Something completely removed from our own lives
D. All of the above
Answer:
(D) I think
Explanation:
Let's look at Answer A; A better idea of how we should look and feel ,when we watch a show that doesn't really pertain to real life,we can get a better idea of how it might change the world if it was like that.
Now lets Look at Answer B; An expanded knowledge of the world around us. When we see something non-realistic we know we can expand our knowledge of how it could be and would be.
Next let's look at Answer C; Something completely removed from our own lives. If something isn't real it was probably a possibility we were thinking of it in our own life's. But if we watched a movie or television show we would have that knowledge removed from our everyday life's
Hope this helps:)! Have a nice day!
Stay Beautiful ❤️
Answer:it’s B
Explanation:
just took the quiz
!!!!!!!! please help fast !!!!!!!!
the novel became popular because of which of these changes in England?
a. the Industrial Revolution
b. social changes
c. the growth of the middle
d. class all of the above
Answer:
I got all of above,
Explanation:
If it wrong lmk so i can re-try
7) How does changing the medium/Film enhance comprehension of the text?
A.It enhanced the ways of the people and the admiration all the women had for Brom Bones
B.It enhanced how we viewed Katrina being promiscuous and the inappropriate relationship with Ichabod
C.It enhanced Ichabod's characteristics, motifs, and frightful legend of the headless horseman
D.It enhanced the aspect of the townspeople and the animals of the land
Plz Help!
Do you agree or disagree and WHY?
Hunting animals is a sport that can be justified because of the theory, survival of the fittest.
Answer:
disagree, because hurting animals is a crime
Explanation:
actually I don't know what is the answer
Please help.
Which words name common ways of creating humor in a sitcom? (Select all correct answers.)
irony
metaphor
repetition
hyperbole
what is the author's main purpose in writing this article? “DO JUVENILE KILLERS DESERVE LIFE BEHIND BARS?” by Nina Totenberg
Answer:
In this article, Totenberg discusses whether life in prison is too harsh a punishment for juvenile killers. He is pretty much asking if life in prison is to bad for criminals.
Explanation:
:D
The article "DO JUVENILE KILLERS DESERVE LIFE BEHIND BARS?" by Nina Totenberg explores the issue of whether or not juveniles who commit murder should be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
What is the opening of the article ?The article opens with a brief description of the case of Lee Boyd Malvo, who was convicted of murder as a teenager and is currently serving a life sentence in prison. The author then goes on to discuss a recent Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of sentencing juveniles to life without parole, as well as several other court cases and research studies.
The article presents arguments from both sides of the debate. Those who argue for more lenient sentencing for juvenile killers point out that teenagers' brains are not fully developed and that they may be more susceptible to peer pressure and other outside influences.
They also argue that teenagers have a greater capacity for rehabilitation than adult offenders, and that it is therefore unfair to sentence them to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
On the other hand, those who argue for holding juvenile killers fully accountable for their crimes argue that murder is a serious crime that should be punished accordingly, regardless of the offender's age. They also point out that some juvenile offenders are capable of committing heinous crimes and may pose a danger to society if they are released from prison.
Throughout the article, the author presents information and arguments in a balanced and objective manner. She cites court cases, research studies, and other sources of information to support her points, and she presents both sides of the debate in a fair and even-handed way.
Ultimately, the purpose of the article is to inform readers about the complex legal and ethical issues surrounding the sentencing of juvenile killers, and to encourage further discussion and debate on the topic.
Learn more about authors at :
https://brainly.com/question/9260046
#SPJ2
How does the author use characters to make a statement about the value of human life in the world of F451? What does the author seem to be saying about the value of human life as viewed by the society Montag lives in? How does the author communicate his message through his characters? lord of flies
Incomplete question. However, I assumed you are referring to the story, "Fahrenheit" 451 by Ray Bradbury.
Explanation:
For example, in the novel, the character Clarisse is portrayed as someone who appreciates nature, so much so that she finds time always to observe creation even though most people in her community are preoccupied with work and entertainment that they lack the time to do so.
Another character is Mildred, the wife of Montag, she is portrayed as someone who has a love for entertainment that is so strong to the extent it overshadows that of her husband. Her behavior contrast with that of Clarisse who has a healthy view of entertainment.
What the author, Montag is saying through his characters is that
those in his society do not value human life, recall we were told the police don't punish those who over speed, thus accidents occur often. those in his society are less concerned about their families; which was made evident in the case of Mildred.What is Reagan’s main purpose in this passage? to threaten the Soviet Union to urge an end to communism to explain why he is visiting Berlin to applaud small acts of resistance
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Ronald Regan's Main Purpose according to the related passage was to urge an end to communism. Notice that in the excerpt for example, (see same attached) he states that totalitarianism creates backwardness and stifles creativity.
Who is Ronald Regan?President Ronal Regan before he resumed at the White House as president was an actor and a politician.
He was notorious for being optimistic, humorous, and focused on creating a stronger economy for the United States of America.
See the link below for more about Ronald Regan:
https://brainly.com/question/12269394
Desdemona tells her father that although she loves him, her duty is now to Othello. At what point does a person's obligation move from their parents to their significant other? Is it possible to be obligated to parents and a significant other? If yes, what potential problems may arise? If no, what potential problems may arise?
Answer and Explanation:
1. The point of obligation of a person passes from the country to another individual when there is greater responsibility than that other individual requires. As shown in the question above, Desdemona had a strong obligation to care for and support her husband, as she lived in a time when women were "properties" of their husbands and were to devote themselves completely to them.
2. It is possible to have an obligation to parents and to another individual, as long as the person who has this obligation is able to organize well and get help, because having obligations to someone is a very big burden and the more people who have this obligation, the greater the burden.
3. The problems that can be generated from this is the overload of people who have obligations to many other people. In this case, to avoid these problems it is necessary to define priorities and delegate the obligations to those involved.
The outsiders what did the church symbolize
Answer:
Sorry. no answer to your question.
Why does the author choose to end this passage in this way
A) to show the reader that Silvio is a sensitive and caring man
B) to demonstrate to the reader that love is the root of all problems
C) to create a comic ending to what is an otherwise tragically sad story
D) to create interest in the reader in hearing about Silvio escape from death
Pls help me
To create interest in the reader in hearing about Silvio escape from death does the author choose to end this passage in this way. Hence, option D is correct.
How do get Silvio to escape?Scare him so hard that he runs away. Don't turn on the fan; instead, take the necessary steps to cause him to pass out. So turn on the service bell, chair lift, and gramophone. He'll become frightened and flee.
Isabella Caruso was a former free-spirited professor who hailed from a family of country nobles. She eventually got married to a political essayist and they had three sons: Silvio Caruso, Renzo and Orlando, who are twins, and Renzo and Orlando.
The golf ball should be placed in the bucket with the other golf balls on the grass. At some point, Caruso will decide to simulate a golf stroke and blow himself up with the ball.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Silvio to escape, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13817174
#SPJ5
what idea is Dr. King trying to convey when he says that “unearned suffering is redemptive”?
Answer:
King is saying that people who have suffered unjustly will eventually be rewarded.
Explanation:
This was in Martin Luther King Jr's "I Have A Dream" speech.The volunteers lifted the boxes.
A.Sentence
B.Fragment
Rusted and broken.
A. Sentence
B.Fragment
The dog barks loudly at strangers.
A.Sentence
B.Fragment
Answer:
A.
B.
A.
Explanation:
The volunteers lifted the boxes.
it gives who and what they did
Rusted and broken.
what was rusted and broken it doesnt give a lot of info
The dog barks loudly at strangers.
it said what the dogs did
Choose the sentence that is written correctly.
A.
Kevin shivered in the cold while he waited for the cab to take him to the station.
B.
The teacher announced a class picnic and the students are shouting happily.
C.
The water pipe broke and the water gushed out and had already flown everywhere in the kitchen.
D.
As the food was served, the hungry children will eat it greedily.
Answer: I think A cause it makes sense
Explanation:
I need help please i will give brainiest. what is the major message that the author suggest about life? Book is Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief please help only if you read the book please
1
Answer: famiy
Explanation: luke ( thats the theif name i think) stole the bolt because his dad didn't care about him and posidin never helped his son and left percys mom on her own.