A John Hopkins study showed that the states with the strictest graduated licensing requirements have a 20% decrease in teen fatalities for 16 year old
drivers.
A True
B. False
The given statement over here is true.
According to Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Injury Research and Policy and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine program called Graduated Driving License program have reduced the incidence of fatal crashes of 16 year old drivers by 11 percent.
The report was supported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Graduated Driver Learning program is an initiative that reduces a fatal crash for innocent drivers.
Graduated driver licensing programs differ in each state. The Hopkins researchers based their analyses on the presence of the following components:
- Minimum Age of obtaining learner's license - 15 1/2 years
- Waiting period to obtain intermediate license - 3 months
- Minimum age for full license- 17 years
- Nighttime driving restrictions
- A restriction on carrying passengers
Data collected by institute was between 1994-2004 to examine various graduated driver licensing programs and fatal crash statistics in 36 U.S. states with graduated driver licensing programs and 7 without
States implemented five programs, the researchers reported an 18 percent difference in fatal crashes involving 16-year-old drivers.
Programs with six or seven components were associated with a 21 percent reduction.
The researchers also found a 16-21 percent reduction in fatal crashes when programs included an age requirement in addition to a wait of at least three months before allowing teens to apply for their intermediate-stage license, plus nighttime driving restrictions and either 30 hours of supervised driving or passenger restrictions.
The authors concluded that the most comprehensive graduated driver licensing programs result in the best reduction of fatal crashes of 16-year-old drivers.
What is John Hopkins University?John Hopkins University is present in Baltimore, U.S.A founded in 1876.
It is the oldest research university in U.S.A. Inaugurated by Daniel Goleman, the university to revolutionize higher education in the U.S. by integrating teaching and research.
To learn more about John Hopkins University here
https://brainly.com/question/15594021
#SPJ3
. Which of the following is NOT a legal duty of an American citizen?
A)Get an education.
b)Vote in all elections.
c)Pay taxes.
D)Serve on juries
Answer:
D. Serve on juries.
Explanation:
I am guessing this, though.
Answer:
Explanation:
b
can someone help me?
Right-of-way is
A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
B. the permission to disobey a traffic control device
C. taken, not given to you
D. different in each US state
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because right of way is when one person has the "right of way" or is the person who goes first in a roadway
Make a friendly appealing message on impact of tourism
Answer:
hope help you stay happy
Elements of the Law Enforcement Branch that are governed by law include _____.
arrest procedure
behavior of those under color of law
provision of a pro bono attorney for plaintiffs without funds for legal counsel
announcing the verdict at the end of the trial
Answer: arrest procedure
Explanation:
The procedure to arrest someone by a law enforcement officer is governed by law to ensure that it is as fair as possible to the person being arrested.
There a procedures detailing the probable cause needed to arrest a person and once the person is arrested, they must be read their rights in relation to the situation. The law also governs the amount of time an arrested person can be held by law enforcement without a charge.
What is a police officer who works inside of a school called?
(Select all that apply.)
school liaison officer
community police officer
school-based police officer
school enforcer
Answer:
school liaison officer
school based police officer
Answer:
School liaison officer
School-based police officer
A defendant sought the services of an out-of-state attorney to represent her against a charge of felony animal abuse. This attorney was erroneously denied pro hac vice admission by the trial court. The defendant then hired an in-state attorney to represent her. The defendant was convicted of the crime, even though the in-state attorney provided the defendant with competent, adequate representation. On appeal, the defendant challenged her conviction on the basis that she was denied her Sixth Amendment right to counsel. How should the appellate court rule on this c
Answer: Reverse the conviction, because the trial court denied the defendant representation by the counsel of her choice.
Explanation:
The appellate court rule on this challenge should be to reverse the conviction, because the trial court denied the defendant representation by the counsel of her choice.
In a situation whereby an attorney isn't provided by the state, a defendant is entitled constitutionally to be represented by a qualified attorney at a trial based on the choice of the defendant.
In this case, the defendant was denied her Sixth Amendment right to counsel and therefore, the conviction should be reversed.
Which one of the following is not a good procedure to follow if you wish to avoid being rear-ended by another vehicle?
What is the main role of a lobbyist?
A. To give money to congressional campaigns
B. To write articles for newspapers about Congress
C. To convince legislators to support or oppose specific bills
D. To provide appropriate administrative staffing to a member of Congress
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Lobbyists are professional advocates that work to influence political decisions on behalf of individuals and organizations. This advocacy could lead to the proposal of new legislation, or the amendment of existing laws and regulations.
What is a distance determination? How is this done?
Answer:
The size and density of the pattern of residues on the object can vary with distance, allowing a firearm examiner to determine the proximity of the shooter to the target when the gun was fired. ... Examiners visually examine and chemically process evidence for the presence of gunshot residues.
Explanation:
A distance determination is the process of estimating the distance between where a shot is fired and its target. It is done by looking at the patterns of powder residue and the shot pattern.
what is a village Panchayat
Answer:
It is a basic village governing institute in India, and it acts as cabinet of the town.
Read this statement.
In legal reasoning, the facts of a case suggest that there is an issue. This issue may already be governed by a rule of law. When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a _[blank]_ can be made as to whether or not the _[blank]_ applies to the _[blank]_.
Which three words, in order, accurately complete the statement?
A-rule; conclusion; issue
B-conclusion; rule; facts
Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
Explain how the laws of supply and demand affect the salaries of professional baseball players.
(answer should be at least 4 well developed sentences)
Answer:
Hi ☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺
can we be friends?
Reformular de la constitución nacional argentina ley de defensa del consumidor
Answer:
La Ley 24.240 de Defensa del Consumidor es una ley de Argentina cuyo objetivo es, como su nombre lo indica, la protección de los consumidores y usuarios de bienes y servicios dentro del territorio de dicho país. Así, identifica al consumidor como la persona que adquiere o utiliza dichos bienes o servicios, y lo protege de los abusos de hecho y derecho por parte del proveedor, que es quien oferta dichos bienes y servicios. A su vez, esta ley ha inspirado a la inclusión del artículo 42 de la Constitución Nacional de Argentina, que garantiza la protección de los consumidores como un derecho de alta jerarquía.
Which diagram correctly arranges systems of government in order from least
powerful to most powerful?
O A
A.
Authoritarian
Constitutional
Anarchy
B.
Anarchy
Authoritarian
Constitutional
C.
Totalitarian
Anarchy
Authoritarian
D.
Constitutional
Authoritarian
Totalitarian
Anarchy refers to a society without any centralized governing authority or hierarchy. Hence option B is correct .
What is systems of government in order ?In an anarchist society, individuals and communities are free to govern themselves, and decision-making is often achieved through direct democracy or consensus-based decision-making. Anarchy is often associated with anti-authoritarianism and a rejection of traditional forms of power and control.
Authoritarianism, on the other hand, is a form of government where power is concentrated in the hands of a small group or individual, often enforced through the use of repression, censorship, and propaganda. Authoritarian regimes are characterized by a lack of political freedoms, limited civil liberties, and the suppression of dissenting voices.
Constitutionalism is a political philosophy that advocates for the rule of law and limited government power, typically enshrined in a written constitution. In a constitutional system, government power is subject to legal constraints and oversight, with the aim of protecting individual rights and promoting democratic accountability. Constitutionalism is often seen as a middle ground between anarchism and authoritarianism, emphasizing the importance of both individual freedom and responsible governance.
Learn more about systems of government here
https://brainly.com/question/16571158
#SPJ5
The plaintiff is suing the defendant for personal injuries suffered when she was struck by the defendant's car. The plaintiff testified regarding the extent of her injuries. The defendant seeks to testify that when she visited the plaintiff in the hospital, the plaintiff said that if the defendant paid all of her medical bills and gave her $25,000, she would not institute legal proceedings. The plaintiff's attorney objects to the offered testimony. How should the judge rule on the admissibility of the testimony
Answer:
Explanation:
The judge should allow it and overrule it. But regarding the evidence that they have of the plaintiff and dependent, maybe ask to see the medical bills and/or anything to prove that that actually happened
Look at the second part of the figure showing electrons being sprayed at two slits. Describe the pattern that they form.
The wave effectively splits into two new waves as it travels through both holes, each of which spreads out from a different slit. Then, there is interference between these two waves. A peak and a trough may occasionally cross paths where they cancel one another out.
What do you mean by Slit?A slit is an extremely small opening or cut in something.
Diffraction causes light to bend and spread across the screen as it passes through a slit, creating a recognizable banded pattern. Light passes through two slits, creating new dark areas. The interference of the light traveling through the slits results in the dark and light zones.
Therefore, The wave effectively splits into two new waves as it travels through both holes, each of which spreads out from a different slit. Then, there is interference between these two waves. A peak and a trough may occasionally cross paths where they cancel one another out.
Learn more about Slit, here;
https://brainly.com/question/24305019
#SPJ2
Is the plea bargain process beneficial for individuals accused of crimes?
Explain your answer. (2+ sentences)
Answer:
Yes because the plea bargains allow victims to avoid having to testify in court, which can be frightening or upsetting, particularly for victims of violent crimes. Some victims also value the certainty that plea bargains provide; they do not have to deal with the emotional trauma of dealing with the acquittal of someone they believe is guilty.
Explanation:
ano ang gagawin mo para walang mamamayang magbuwis ng buhay
Answer:
Ang aking gagawin ay Poprotektahan ko ang aking bayan
On a city street you should be looking ahead as far ahead as the car in front of you.
Answer:
When you drive in city traffic, you should look at least one block ahead. On the highway, 10 to 15 seconds is about a quarter of a mile. Take In the Whole Scene: Looking 10 to 15 seconds ahead does not mean looking only at the middle of the road. It means looking at the side of the road as well.
Explanation:
Actually, this statement here is not right, on a city road one must look at least ahead of one block as per traffic rules for our safety.
How must we drive on a city road?A city road which is often crowded and packed so to drive on a city road, by looking as far as a car ahead might cause for an accident so to avoid such circumstance one must consider looking at least half or quarter miles ahead of them and not just the center of the road, driver must look at the side streets as well in case some vehicle is arriving from there.
What are traffic rules?Traffic rules are a set of guidelines provided by the state to its subject to be followed when driving or walking on streets. The traffic rules are must to be followed as these rules are made to keep the residents of the state secure and protected when they are out on the streets. The traffic rules play an important role in avoiding the chaos of all the vehicles as traffic rules provide guidelines which vehicle move in what lane and when is there a time for pedestrian to cross the road.
How to ensure safety on road?By following the traffic rules, we must ensure our safety on a city road. As following such guidelines will ensure that there must not be any unruly vehicle moving towards us to collide or cause any accident.
Hence, properly following the traffic rules guarantee one’s safety on the city roads.
To learn more about traffic rules here,
https://brainly.com/question/3000878
#SPJ2
What is the difference between civil cases and criminal cases?
Question 2 (1 point)
is the process of making a choice or finding a solution.
оа
b
goal setting
prior planning
problem solving
С
d
decision making
A standard serving of alcohol can be compared to ...
A. a serving size on a food label.
B. the recommended daily calories on a food label.
C. the amount of sugars on a food label.
A standard serving of alcohol can be compared to a serving size on a food label. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is alcohol?
These beverages, including beer, wine, and liquor, all contain alcohol. Ethanol is the name of the type of alcohol. Some medications, mouthwashes, and home goods also contain it.
The serving size is an accurate representation of how much an individual generally consumes. It's critical to understand that every nutrient value shown on the label, including the number of calories, refers to the serving size.
As a result, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on alcohol, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4698220
#SPJ2
Given the high cost of tickets to Major League baseball game, come up with a convincing argument that a professional baseball player can make to support free agency.
Answer:
Explanation:
Major league baseball team is the oldest of major professional sport leagues which makes it a famous one. Many sport lovers especially baseball are always looking forward to their game. For this reason, even if tickets are sold at very high rates, they will be willing to pay.
I am a professional baseball player and currently at the peak of my career. Being at the peak of my career makes me eligible for free agency. I assure you that if i and signed up with your team tickets will be sold like never before. I have got so many fans out there who are willing and ready to pay to watch my game.
Also seeing me move into the Major league baseball team is onething that will interest them more. This will promote the team more and increase more chances of sponsorship from companies.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Question 11 (1 point)
The rights and liberties that can be claimed by individuals by virtue of being human. Such rights are also sometimes referred to as natural
rights or human rights.
O a
ob
majority rule
individual rights
popular sovereignty
natural rights
C
C
Od
Answer: Individual right
Explanation:
The rights and liberties that can be claimed by individuals by virtue of being human are refered to as the individual rights, natural rights or human rights.
Individual right refers to a right of a person's freedom without any sort of interference from the government. Some examples of these rights are the right to vote, right to travel, right to own property, etc.
Pedestrians, bicyclists, and skateboarders the rules of right of way when they use the road.
A. must follow
B. may ignore
C. may choose to follow
D. must not follow
The Answer is Mostly likely Must Follow Road users should always follow the rules.
What is blue spelled backwards
the answer is Eulb. that is blue spelled backwards
Right-of-way is
A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
B. the permission to disobey a traffic control device
DC. taken, not given to you
different in each US state
Answer: A. the immediate use of a certain part of the roadway
Explanation:
Right of way is a law in which a special privilege is given to the person or class of people to go through or pass over land occupied by another person via a particular path or line. For example, immediate utilization of the certain path of the roadway or land, canal, pubic footpath, well, temple, river, pond, park, garden or any other private property.
Alex Attorney is representing Carol Client is a case involving a car accident. Walter Witness is the only person who both saw the wreck and was not directly involved in it. Long before the trial, Alex has Walter placed under oath, questions him in person, and takes testimony from him. Walter has participated in a(n) ______________. These events have happened during the ____________ stage of the trial.
Answer: interrogatory; discovery
Explanation:
Walter has participated in an interrogatory. This refers to the list of questions that is sent to a party by another party which is used for the discovery process. In this case, Walter must answer the questions under oath.
Furthermore, since Alex has Walter placed under oath, questions him in person, and takes testimony from him, then Walter has participated in an interrogatory and this occured during the duscovery stage of the trial.