PLSS HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP ASAP PLSS

Answer:

Incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

This is incorrect. In order to add two fractions that have unlike denominators, it is true that you first need to find a common denominator. When you change a fractions denominator you must also change it's numerator in proportion to the change in the denominator. For example, if you change the denominator in the fraction [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] into a 4 then you are multiplying the denominator by 2, therefore you will also need to multiply the numerator by 2 which would give you a new fraction of [tex]\frac{2}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

Hello! the answer is X=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

d: 68

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D.68

Step-by-step explanation:

i figured it out to lol

Answer:

a) parallel lines : CE and BF

b)perpendicular lines : DE and EF

c) is FE parallel to CA : no

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it would be right next to the other line

Step-by-step explanation:

s = sugar cones

w = waffle cones

Answer: 40

Step-by-step explanation: -7 + 3 (-12) -(3)

                                               -7 - 36 + 3

                                                      -40

Answer: 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

24 divided by 48 is 0.50 so 50%

Answer:

200%

Step-by-step explanation:

2=200% and 24 × 2 = 48

Answer:

28

Step-by-step explanation:

what you do is add 39 plus 74

that answer will give you 113 so then you subtract 180 from that

then you get 67, then what you do is subtract 39 and you would get 28

x = 28

Given:

Lamar drinks water with,

Breakfast = 8 ounces

Vitamins = 6 ounces

Lunch = 16 ounces

Dinner = 16 ounces

Bottle = 32 ounces

To find:

The a numerical expression for the amount of water in ounces that he drinks in a week.

Solution:

One day consumption of water by Lamar is

[tex]8+6+16+16+32=78[/tex]

We know that,

1 week = 7 days

One day consumption of water = 78 ounces

1 week (7 days) consumption of water = 7× One day consumption of water

                                                               = 7×(8+6+16+16+32) ounces                                                                

                                                               = 7×78 ounces

                                                               = 546 ounces

Therefore, the required numerical expression for the amount of water in ounces that he drinks in a week is 7×(8+6+16+16+32) ounces and the value is 546 ounces.  

Answer:

she can buy 70 ft tape

Step-by-step explanation:

5.6 ÷ 0.07

Answer:

x=3 C

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-13=-3x+11

8x-13=11

8x=24

x=3

Answer:

the answer is x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

i hope this help you

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-11

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

304.8 millimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.003

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Its the third one from up. Second from bottom.

Step-by-step explanation: I looked at all of the other ones and they did not make sense. Let me know if I got wrong. God Bless!

Answer:

x = 73 is the number of hours she worked at her job last month.

Step-by-step explanation:

12 is the hourly wage that she earn at her job.

340 is the bonus she received.

1216 is the total she earn from her job.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1. multiply both sides by 3

  2. (a) chose to multiply by 2/3 instead of 3/2; (b) did the multiplications incorrectly, both for the fraction and the integer; (c) x = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

1. If you want to "clear fractions," you multiply by the denominator of the fraction.

  3(2/3)x = 3(6)

  2x = 18

__

2. The coefficient of x is 2/3. If you want it to be 1, you need to multiply by the multiplicative inverse of 2/3, which is 3/2. Doing that gives ...

  (3/2)(2/3)x = (3/2)6

Then simplifying gives ...

  x = 18/2 = 9

__

Trey's mistakes were: a) choosing the wrong multiplier; b) carrying out the multiplication incorrectly. (2/3)(2/3) = 4/9, and 6(2/3) = 4. Had Trey done the multiplications correctly, he would have seen that he needed a different multiplier to get to the answer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: dude i think we in the same class for math

Answer:

a) Yes agree

and b) (I'm not too sure about this one but I think..) By CPCT that is Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are equal/congruent theorem.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'll use this " [ " symbol for angle.

a) yes agreed ;

AB = CB (B is the midpoint of AC)

[ ABD = [ CBD = 90°

BD = BD (common side)

--> therefore by SAS criteria triangle ABD is congruent to triangle CBD.

and by CPCT .... AD = CD .

b) AD = CD (proven by CPCT)

...answer for b you're likely suppose to write it that way. so yeah hope this helps.

Answer:

8,10,20 pls mark me as brainliest

Answer:

A triangle can not have a side that is longer than the sum of the other two sides.  In this case, the second answer does not fit a triangle, as 20 > 8 + 10.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Answer:

=  7 + (5 – 9)2 + 3(16 ÷ 8)

= 7 + (-4)2 + 3(2)

= 7 + (-8) + 6

= -1 + 6

= 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember to use PEMDAS when solving.

Answer:

9.71 Only way I could think of to solve it

Step-by-step explanation:

10x-72=3x-4

7x=68

x=9.71

Answer:

The length is 28 and the width is 11

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem, we can make the width as x.

Since the length is 5 less than 3 times the width, it's going to be 3x - 5

So now we've got the length and width, just need to find the perimeter, which is all the sides added up together. They already gave us the perimeter, so we just have to solve the equation:

2(3x - 5) + 2x = 78

6x - 10 + 2x = 78

8x - 10 = 78

8x = 88

x = 11

x = 11, but remember, x is the width, not the length. Since we already found what x is, we just have to plug it into the equation of:

3x - 5

3 × 11 - 5

33 - 5 = 28

Answer: Length = 28 (don't forget to add the unit if there is one)

Step-by-step explanation:

A non negative integer is an integer that that is either positive or zero. It's the union of the natural numbers and the number zero

Answer:

the correct selling price is $10

And, the error is that the manager put the markup percentage as a selling price instead of adding up the markup to the cost price

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation is shown below:

Given that

Markup = 25%

Cost of an item = $8

Selling price of an item = $2

Based on the above information

The amount of markup would be

= 25% × 8%

= $2

Now amount after markup is

= $2 + $8

= $10

Hence, the correct selling price is $10

And, the error is that the manager put the markup percentage as a selling price instead of adding up the markup to the cost price

Answer:

part A:The correct selling price is $10

Part B:And, the error is that the manager put the markup percentage as a selling price instead of adding up the markup to the cost price

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Substitute in the x value to see if both of the y values of both of the equations match the one you approximated from the graph.

Step-by-step explanation:

I guess that we are working with systems of equations like:

y = f(x)

y = g(x)

Where an intersection is a solution that works for both equations, which means that the graphs will intersect each other in that point.

This means that for a given value x = x0, we must have:

f(x0) = g(x0).

Now, when you find a point that you think that is an intersection, you should substitute the x value in both functions, and see if the y-values coincide.

This will be equivalent to look if f(x) = g(x) for that particular value.

then the correct option is:

substitute in the x value to see if both of the y values of both of the equations match the one you approximated from the graph.

Answer:

17

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Let's solve your equation step-by-step.

3x+2=14

Step 1: Subtract 2 from both sides.

3x+2−2=14−2

3x=12

Step 2: Divide both sides by 3.

3x /3 = 12/3

x=4

Answer:

polygons that have the same shape, but not the same size .

Step-by-step explanation: