PLZZ HELP I WILL GIVE A !)) POINTS Danny attempts the feat of jumping his motorcycle through the Flaming Hoop Jump of Awesome. In order for Daredevil Danny to pass through the hoop, he will need a safe path to travel. Let’s explore the parabolic trajectory that he will need for a safe journey.Step 4: Calculate the equation for the flaming hoop jump.
Using the same method for the practice jump, write the standard form of the equation that will get Daredevil Danny safely through the Flaming Hoop Jump of Awesome!


Determine the values of a, b, and c. Show your work. (10 points)


Using your values of a, b, and c, did Daredevil Danny successfully pass through the Flaming Hoop Jump of Awesome? If not, describe what happened. Then, go back to critique your work and revise it. Write about your revision. (5 points)


Once you have determined the correct values of a, b, and c, verify algebraically that Daredevil Danny will successfully pass through the Flaming Hoop Jump of Awesome. (5 points

Answer:

joe mama

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We use Pythagoras' theorem:

[tex] \bf {AC}^{2} = {AB}^{2} + {BC}^{2} \\ \\ \bf {AC}^{2} = ( \frac{12}{13})^{2} + ( \frac{5}{13} )^{2} \\ \\ \bf {AC}^{2} = \frac{ {12}^{2} }{ {13}^{2} } + \frac{ {5}^{2} }{ {13}^{2} } \\ \\ \bf {AC}^{2} = \frac{144}{169} + \frac{25}{169} \\ \\ \bf {AC}^{2} = \frac{169}{169} \\ \\ \bf {AC}^{2} = 1 \\ \\ \bf AC = \sqrt{1} \Rightarrow \red{ \boxed{ \bf AC = 1} } [/tex]

Answer:

AC = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

This is Pythagoras' theorem, which states that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.

⇒ Th.P ⇒ AC² = AB² + BC²

<=> AC² = (12/13)² + (5/13)²

<=> AC² = 144+25/169

<=> AC² = 169/169

<=> AC² = 1

⇒ AC = √1 = 1.

Answer:

A. The range of both data sets is 40

Step-by-step explanation:

Range = the maximum value - the minimum value

✔️For the Seventh-Grade Students' data set,

Maximum value = 45

Minimum Value = 5

Range = 45 - 5 = 40

✔️✔️For the Eight-Grade Students' data set,

Maximum value = 45 (the value at the whisker to your far right)

Minimum Value = 5 (value indivl ated by the whisker on your far left)

Range = 45 - 5 = 40

Therefore, the two data sets can be described as having the same range of 40.

Answer: The rates of change for both function A and function B are positive : TRUE

The rates of change for functions A is 3 times the rate of change for function B : FALSE

The y - intercepts for both Function A and Function B are positive : FALSE

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The LCL for a 90% confidence interval for p is 0.82.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of [tex]\pi[/tex], and a confidence level of [tex]1-\alpha[/tex], we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

[tex]\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]

In which

z is the zscore that has a pvalue of [tex]1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}[/tex].

A lawn service owner is testing new weed killers. He discovered that a particular weed killer was effective 89% of time. Suppose that this estimate was based on a random sample of 60 applications.

This means that [tex]\pi = 0.89, n = 60[/tex]

90% confidence level

So [tex]\alpha = 0.1[/tex], z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of [tex]1 - \frac{0.1}{2} = 0.95[/tex], so [tex]Z = 1.645[/tex].

The lower limit of this interval is:

[tex]\pi - z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.89 - 1.645\sqrt{\frac{0.89*0.11}{60}} = 0.8236[/tex]

Rounding to two decimal places, the LCL for a 90% confidence interval for p is 0.82.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  A)  105°

Step-by-step explanation:

The two marked angles are alternate interior angles, so are congruent.

  8x +17 = 9x +6

  11 = x

  8x +17 = 8(11) +17 = 88 +17 = 105 . . . . degrees

The bolded angle is 105°.

Answer:

105 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Here ,

8x+17=9x+6(being alternate angles )

17-6=9x-8x

11= x

Again,

8x-17=8×11+17

Therefore 8x-17=105 degrees

Answer:

10°

Step-by-step explanation:

You can see the three angles shown form a straight line, meaning they add up to 180°. We can et up the equation:

m<AOC + m<COD + m<DOB = 180°

And we can substitute the values we have:

5a + 18 + 24 - a + 8a - 30 = 180

Next, we can combine all like terms:

12a + 12 = 180

12a = 168

a = 14

Now, to find each angle, we can substitute the value of a:

m<AOC = 5a + 18 = 5(14) + 18 = 88°

m<COD = 24 - a = 24 - 14 = 10°

m<DOB = 8a - 30 = 8(14) - 30 = 82°

The smallest angle is <COD with a measure of 10°.

Answer:

horizontal

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer: 15/16 Hope this helps!

Answer: five and a half weeks.

Step-by-step explanation: 20 times 2 (the twice a week deposit) = 40. 220 (the negative checking) divided by 40 (the deposits each week) equals 5.5

Answer:

x = -1.525

y = 8.525

Step-by-step explanation:

xy = -13

x + y = 7

we can let 'y' equal 7-x and use substitution

x(7-x) = -13

7x - x² + 13 = 0

divide through by negative one to get a positive x²

x² - 7x - 13 = 0

use the quadratic formula to get:

x = -1.525

y = 8.525

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

8

Answer:

The exponential form of [tex]\log_{4} 4 = 1[/tex] is [tex]4 = 4^{1}[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

After some research in the web, we find that correct statement is:

Rewrite [tex]\log_{4} 4 = 1[/tex] in exponential form.

We obtain its exponential form by using the definition of logarithm:

[tex]4^{\log_{4} 4} = 4^{1}[/tex]

[tex]4 = 4^{1}[/tex]

Complete question :

According to the National Association of Realtors, it took an average of three weeks to sell a home in 2017. Suppose data for the sale of 39 randomly selected homes sold in Greene County, Ohio, in 2017 showed a sample mean of 3.6 weeks with a sample standard deviation of 2 weeks. Conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether the number of weeks until a house sold in Greene County differed from the national average in 2017. Useα = 0.05for the level of significance, and state your conclusion

Answer:

H0 : μ = 3

H1 : μ ≠ 3

Test statistic = 1.897

Pvalue = 0.0653

fail to reject the Null ; Hence, we conclude that their is no significant to accept the claim that number I weeks taken to sell a house differs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Sample size, n = 40

Sample mean, x = 3.6

Population mean, μ = 3

Standard deviation, s = 2

The hypothesis :

H0 : μ = 3

H1 : μ ≠ 3

The test statistic :

(xbar - μ) ÷ (s/√n)

(3.6 - 3) / (2/√40)

0.6 / 0.3162277

Test statistic = 1.897

Using T test, we can obtain the Pvalue from the Test statistic value obtained :

df = n - 1; 40 - 1 = 39

Pvalue(1.897, 39) = 0.0653

Decison region :

If Pvalue ≤ α ; Reject the null, if otherwise fail to reject the Null.

α = 0.05

Pvalue > α ; We fail to reject the Null ; Hence, we conclude that their is no significant to accept the claim that number I weeks taken to sell a house differs.

Answer:

C) Infinitely many

Step-by-step explanation:

7x+3-x=3(1+2x)

6x+3=3+6x

Subtract 3 from both sides

6x = 6x

Infinitely many solutions

Answer:

30 mins = 0.5 hours

4.5 miles/0.5 hours = your answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

speed = distance

time

speed = 4

30

speed = 7.5

Question Completion:

The Worthington family has liquid assets of $10,000, use assets of $150,000 and investment assets of $34,000. They also have liabilities totaling $108,000. They need a loan from the bank and to qualify for the loan, they must have a net worth of $100,000.  They will incur additional $7,000 in liabilities.

Answer:

1. The Worthington Family's net worth is:

= $79,000.

2. No. They will not qualify for the loan, as their net worth fell short of the requirement by $21,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Worthington Family's net worth:

Liquid assets =                      $10,000

Use assets =                         150,000

Investment assets =              34,000

Total assets =                    $194,000

Liabilities =                            115,000

Net worth =                         $79,000

Required net worth =       $100,000

Shortfall in net worth =      $21,000

b) The Worthington Family's net worth is the difference between their assets (the things that they own) and their liabilities (the things that they owe others).  It is an important financial metric for calibrating the family's financial health.  Computing it provides a useful snapshot of the family's current financial position.  Financial institutions and other potential creditors use it to gauge if they might extend some credit facilities to the Worthington family.

Answer:

The answer is Perpendicular

Answer:

it's d

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 1 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

3/3 is = 1

2/3 = 2/3

5/3 = 1 + 2/3

5/3 = 1 2/3

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Correct Median:

9, 3, 6, 1, 4 (median = 4)

1, 6, 9 (median = 6)

​4. 9, 11, 13, 16, 20 (median = 12)

Incorrect Median:

2. 7.9, 11, 14, 76 (median = 76)

43, 46, 48, 52 (median = 48)

3, 10, 7 (median = 10)

Answer:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{\frac{-729}{216} } = \sqrt[3]{\frac{9*9*9*}{6*6*6} } = (\frac{9^3}{6^3})^{\frac{1}{3} } = \frac{9}{6} = \frac{3}{2}[/tex]

option a

Answer:

G

Step-by-step explanation:

From the box plots given, the options that seem very much on support of the information given in the box plot is option G.

Median number in a box plot is the number at the point where the vertical line divides the box.

The median for Thin Crust is about 55 while the median for Thick Crust is above 55.

Therefore we can conclude that:

"The median number of orders for thick crust pizzas is larger than the median median number of orders for thin crust".

Answer:

so what is the question?

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To properly apply the substitution method, it will be better for us to rearrange the system of equations to have similar variables on the same side

[tex]44 - 4 = -2y ----equation 1[/tex]

[tex]10 = 7x + 4y --- equation 2[/tex]

We can simply evaluate equation 1 to have

[tex]40 = -2y\\y = 40/-2 = -20\\[/tex]

y = -20

From the first equation alone, we can evaluate the value of y as -20. This is because only one unknown is present in equation one, hence a single equation is sufficient enough to evaluate it. If to unknowns were present, the two equations would have been utilized to evaluate the solution.

Answer: Choice A) z

==========================================================

Explanation:

x and y are two integers, with x being nonzero

This means x/y is rational as long as y is nonzero as well. If y = 0, then we have a division by zero error. Try something like 1/0 on your calculator and you'll find it doesn't work.

Similarly, y/x is rational as well. Any rational number is simply dividing two integers as a fraction like this. Other examples include stuff like 1/2, 4/5, 8/17, and so on.

Since y is an integer, this means we can write it like this: y = y/1. This shows any integer is also rational, but not the other way around. A fraction like 2/3 is rational but not an integer.

All of what was discussed above indicates that choices B, C and D can be ruled out. The only thing left is choice A. The variable z isn't defined, so it's not clear what it is exactly. But it's likely the answer as it's the only thing left after the eliminations.

Exponentiation is not clear

If so Exponentiation

a²b²+2ab(a²+1)+a²-b²-1

this answer

a²b²+2a³b-b²+2ab+a²-1

As for if so Exponentiation

[tex]a²b²+2ab(a²+1)+a² - b {}^{2 - 1} [/tex]

this answer

a²b²+2a³b+2ab+a²-b