Question 11 i’m confused

The next three terms of the sequence 1, 4, 6, 11, 21, 38 are 70, 123, 216.

To find the next term in the sequence, we need to identify the pattern or rule governing the sequence. Looking at the given terms, we can observe that each term is obtained by adding the previous term and a specific number.

From the given sequence:

4 = 1 + 3

6 = 4 + 2

11 = 6 + 5

21 = 11 + 10

38 = 21 + 17

The difference between the consecutive terms appears to be increasing by 1 each time. So, we can infer that the next difference would be 17 + 1 = 18.

Now, to find the next term:

38 + 18 = 56

56 + 19 = 75

75 + 20 = 95

Therefore, the next three terms of the sequence are 70, 123, 216.

To know more about sequence refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

Answer:

17.83in

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter of circle with circumference 56 inches 17.81 inches .

Given,

Circumference = 56 inches

Now,

Circumference of circle = 2πr

r = radius of circle.

Substitute the values to get the value of radius,

56 = 2 × π × r

56 = 2× 22/7× r

r = 56 × 7/44

r = 8.909 inches.

Next,

Diameter = 2 (Radius)

Diameter = 2 * 8.909

Diameter = 17.81 inches .

Know more about circle,

https://brainly.com/question/22516483

#SPJ4

Answer:

x=0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Short answer: Empty set ∅

if x is less than -1 then it can't be greater than 1

Since the r-value is quite close to -1 (only 0.0562 away), we can conclude that the two variables are strongly negatively associated. This implies that when one variable increases, the other variable decreases.

In statistics, the correlation coefficient is used to quantify the linear relationship between two variables. The r-value ranges from -1 to 1, indicating the degree to which the variables are positively or negatively associated.

The r-value measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1.

The closer the r-value is to -1, the stronger and more negative the correlation is.

The closer the r-value is to 1, the stronger and more positive the correlation is.

A value of 0 indicates that there is no linear relationship between the variables.In this case, the r-value is -0.9438.

Because the r-value is negative, the two variables are negatively associated. The closer the r-value is to -1, the stronger the negative association is.

Learn more about correlation coefficient at:

https://brainly.com/question/24443084

#SPJ11

Answer:

The theoretical probabilty of the coin landing on tails is 50/50 so their is a 50% chance of it landing on tails so theoretically it would land on tails 15 out of 30 times

Step-by-step explanation:

The monthly payment for an $8,720 loan at 12.5 percent for 15 years is $312.84

The formula for calculating the compound interest is expressed as:

A = P(1+r/n)^nt

Given

P = $8720

r = 12.5% = 0.125
n = 12
t = 15

Substitute

A = 8720(1+0.125/12)^180
A = 1.8622 *  8720

A = $56,312.74

Monthly payment = 56,312.74/180
Monthly payment = 312.84

Hence the monthly payment for an $8,720 loan at 12.5 percent for 15 years is $312.84

Learn more on compound interest here: https://brainly.com/question/24924853

Answer: Yes it is

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes it is. Succese to The homework

Answer:

Ok y does not = 0 (They say this because is y=0 it would be undefined anything divided by 0 is undefined)

[tex](3\sqrt{12x^2})/16y\\[/tex]

Answer: [tex](3x\sqrt{3})/8y[/tex]

Answer :

AB = 48.88

Step-by-step explanation:

We will use the sin fulmera

[tex] \frac{ \sin(134°) }{ab} = \frac{ \sin(18°) }{21} \\ \\ ab = 48.88[/tex]

I hope that is useful for you :)

Answer:

48.9

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{A}{sinA}=\frac{B}{sinB} =\frac{C}{sinC}[/tex]   (you can flip the equation around)

[tex]\frac{21}{sin18} = \frac{AB}{sin134}[/tex]

[tex]AB=\frac{21*134}{sin18}= 48.88448235[/tex]

Sorry for the late answer I was distracted

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

In order to solve for x, we need to isolate the variable on one side of the equation.

To do this, we subtract 450 from both sides of the equation, and this will give you:

28.75x = 517.5

As mentioned, we need to isolate x, so we divide both sides by 28.75. This will give the following.

x = 18

Hope this helps!

The 95% confidence interval for the true population mean is 53.18 < μ < 58.82

To construct a 95% confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight, we can use the formula:

CI = x ± Z * (σ/√n)

where:

x is the sample mean,

Z is the critical value for the desired confidence level (95% confidence corresponds to Z = 1.96),

σ is the population standard deviation, and

n is the sample size.

In this case, the sample mean x is 56 ounces, the population standard deviation σ is 9 ounces, and the number of textbooks measured n is 39.

Plugging these values into the formula, we have:

CI = 56 ± 1.96 * (9/√39)

Calculating the values:

CI = 56 ± 1.96 * (9/√39)

CI = 56 ± 1.96 * (9/6.24)

CI = 56 ± 1.96 * 1.44

CI = 56 ± 2.82

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight is approximately:

53.18 < μ < 58.82

Learn more on confidence interval here;

https://brainly.com/question/17097944

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 0

y = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x + y = 2 (Multiply by 2)

x – 2y = -4

4x + 2y = 4

x – 2y = -4

5x = 0

x = 0

2x + y = 2

2(0) + y = 2

0 + y = 2

y = 2

Answer:

They are the same thing!

Step-by-step explanation:

8*3=24 (Because 1 yard is 3 feet)

24 = 24!

Answer:

8yd 24ft= 48ft 0.000000in

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

3 coffees + 2 muffins = $7

therefore,

[tex]3x + 2y = 7[/tex]

2 coffees + 4 muffins = $8

therefore,

[tex]2x + 4y = 8[/tex]

Answer:

i think in every coast we're adding two shillings in the first sentence the total was 5 and we paid $7 and in the second sentence the total was 8 dollars meaning we added to shillings.

Step-by-step explanation:

in my school we are taughtthat we shouldn't mix goats with sheeps so we this the same way we can't mix x and y so in my opinion I guess you can say x + y =to that amount of money at the end you paid if it's 8 dollars or 7 dollars. we can say x represents the coffees and y represents the muffins that's how I get it I hope you want to be angry with me. for example 3 + 2 equals to 7 .3 + 2 is 5 so we'll carry five to the other side of equals where we will make it be minus so we'll say 7 - 5 where will get 2

The areas under the standard normal curve are:

To find the area under the standard normal curve, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

Area from z = 0 to z = 1.46:

Using a calculator, the area under the curve from z = 0 to z = 1.46 is 0.4306.

Area from z = -0.32 to z = 0.98:

Using a calculator, the area under the curve from z = -0.32 to z = 0.98 is 0.6126.

Area from z = 0.07 to z = 2.51:

Using a calculator, the area under the curve from z = 0.07 to z = 2.51 is 0.4959.

Area to the right of z = 2.13:

Using a calculator, the area to the right of z = 2.13 is 0.0161.

Area to the left of z = 1.04:

Using a calculator, the area to the left of z = 1.04 is 0.8508.

Learn more about standard normal curve at: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ4

The score on the second test that is comparable to a score of 127 on the first test is 131.

Given that: IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with an expected value of 100 and Variance of 324 and another IQ test for which the scores of adult Americans are known to have a normal distribution with an expected value of 50 and Variance 100.

Let x denote the first test score that is comparable to a second test score of 127. Then, we have; (127 − 100) / 18 = (x − 50) / 10 (the z-scores corresponding to the scores)

Simplifying the above equation gives;

(127 − 100) × 10 = (x − 50) × 18

Solve for x as follows;

(127 − 100) × 10 + 50 = (x) × 18

Hence, x = 131

To know more about z-scores , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30557336

#SPJ11

The score on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test is 4.332, or approximately 4.33 (rounded to two decimal places).

If X1, X2 are the IQ scores of the first and second tests respectively, we are given that X1 and X2 are both normally distributed. This means that their expected values and variances are known.

E(X1) = 100, Var(X1) = σ1² = 324E(X2) = 50, Var(X2) = σ2² = 100

We need to find the score, x on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test.

Therefore, we need to find

P(X1 ≤ 127) and then solve for x so that

P(X2 ≤ x) = P(X1 ≤ 127).

We know that

Z1 = (X1 - μ1) / σ1 and

Z2 = (X2 - μ2) / σ2 where μ1, μ2 are the respective expected values.

For a given probability P(Z ≤ z), we can find z using a standard normal table. Therefore, we can rewrite P(X1 ≤ 127) in terms of Z1 as follows;

P(X1 ≤ 127) = P((X1 - μ1) / σ1 ≤ (127 - μ1) / σ1) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - μ1) / σ1) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - 100) / 18) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5)

The corresponding score on the second test, X2 can be found using;

Z2 = (X2 - μ2) / σ2 ⇒ X2 = σ2 Z2 + μ2

From the given values, μ2 = 50 and σ2 = 10.

Therefore,

X2 = σ2 Z2 + μ2 = 10 Z2 + 50

We need to find the value of x such that

P(Z2 ≤ x) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5).

From a standard normal table,

we have P(Z ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332 and therefore,

P(Z2 ≤ x) = 0.9332 implies that

x = (0.9332 - 0.5) / 0.1 = 4.332.

Therefore, the score on the second test which is equivalent to a score of 127 on the first test is 4.332, or approximately 4.33 (rounded to two decimal places).

We are given

E(X1) = 100, Var(X1) = σ1² = 324E(X2) = 50, Var(X2) = σ2² = 100

We need to find x such that P(X1 ≤ 127) = P(X2 ≤ x).

Therefore, we find P(X1 ≤ 127) in terms of Z1 as follows;

P(X1 ≤ 127) = P(Z1 ≤ (127 - 100) / 18) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332

The corresponding value of X2, denoted by x can be found from

P(Z2 ≤ x) = P(Z1 ≤ 1.5).

From a standard normal table, we have

P(Z ≤ 1.5) = 0.9332 and therefore,

P(Z2 ≤ x) = 0.9332 implies that

x = (0.9332 - 0.5) / 0.1 = 4.332.

To know more about expected values, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28197299

#SPJ11

Answer:

big shaq

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 9

m<J = 57

m<K = 44

m<L = 79

Step-by-step explanation:

Theorem:

The sum of the measures of the angles of a triangle is 180°.

We add the measures of the angles, and set the sum equal to 180. Then we solve for x, and use the value of x to find the measure of each angle.

7x - 6 + 3x + 17 + 9x - 2 = 180

Combine like terms on the left side: 7x + 3x + 9x = 19x and -6 + 17 - 2 = 9

19x + 9 = 180

Subtract 9 from both sides.

19x = 171

Divide both sides by 19.

x = 9

Now we find the measure of each angle.

m<J = 7x - 6 = 7(9) - 6 = 63 - 6 = 57

m<K = 2x + 17 = 3(9) + 17 = 27 + 17 = 44

m<L = 9x - 2 = 9(9) - 2 = 81 - 2 = 79

Answer:

21 1/2 yd

Step-by-step explanation:

43/4 + 43/4 = 21 1/2 yd

Answer:

g(f(x)) = 2x - 6

f(g(x)) = 2x - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

g(f(x)) = 2x - 8 + 2

g(f(x)) = 2x - 6

f(g(x)) = 2(x + 2) - 8

f(g(x)) = 2x - 4

Answer: g ( 2 x − 8 ) = 2 x− 6

Step-by-step explanation: MAKE ME BRAINLIEST!!!!!

Answer:

the answer will be 14,3 ok but check it

The solution to the given initial value problem is u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x

Given Differential equation is J²u(x, t) Ət² = dx²I.

C is u(x,0) = e-x² and ut (x,0) = 0

We need to find the solution to the given initial value problem. The general solution to the given Differential equation is

u(x,t) = f1(x − t) + f2(x + t)

where f1 and f2 are arbitrary functions. We need to find the particular solution that satisfies the given initial conditions. Given intial condition,

u(x,0) = e-x² …………(1)

ut (x,0) = 0…………(2)

Let us find the value of f1(x) and f2(x) using the given intial condition,

From equation (1)u(x,0) = f1(x) + f2(x) = e-x²

Now, Differentiating f1(x) + f2(x) = e-x² w.r.t x, we getf1'(x) + f2'(x) = -2x ………..(3)

From equation (2)

ut (x,0) = f1'(x) + f2'(x) = 0

On solving the above two equations, we get

f1'(x) = x, f1(x) = ½x² + C1

and

f2'(x) = -x, f2(x) = ½x² + C2

Now, the particular solution is

u(x,t) = ½(x − t)² + C1 + ½(x + t)² + C2

u(x,t) = (x² + t² + C1 + C2)………….(4)

Using the initial condition u(x,0) = e-x² in equation (4)

e-x² = x² + C1 + C2

Now, we know that for large value of x, the term e-x² becomes negligible. So, C1 + C2 = 0 ⇒ C2 = -C1

Substituting C2 = -C1 in equation (4), we get

u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x

The solution to the given initial value problem is u(x,t) = [e−(z−¹)² + e¯(x+t)²]. [infinity] < x.

learn more about initial value problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/30466257

#SPJ11

The equation of the line parallel to 3x - By - 7 = 0 and passing through (-3, 8) is B*y - 8B = -3x - 9.

To find the equation of a line parallel to the given line, we need to determine the slope of the given line. The equation of the given line is 3x - By - 7 = 0.

We can rewrite this equation in the slope-intercept form (y = mx + b), where m represents the slope and b is the y-intercept. By rearranging the equation, we have:

By - 7 = -3x

By = -3x + 7

Dividing both sides by B (assuming B ≠ 0):

y = (-3/B)x + 7/B

From the equation y = (-3/B)x + 7/B, we can see that the slope of the given line is -3/B.

Since the line we're looking for is parallel to the given line, it will have the same slope. Therefore, the slope of the line we seek is also -3/B.

We are given that the line passes through the point (-3, 8). We can use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

Substituting the values (-3, 8) for (x1, y1) and -3/B for m:

y - 8 = (-3/B)(x - (-3))

y - 8 = (-3/B)(x + 3)

Multiplying through by B:

By - 8B = -3(x + 3)

Simplifying:

B*y - 8B = -3x - 9

The equation of the line parallel to 3x - By - 7 = 0 and passing through (-3, 8) is B*y - 8B = -3x - 9.

For more questions on equation

https://brainly.com/question/13071221

#SPJ8

Answer:

I think the first is answer bcz 35+55=90 ..... 180-90=90

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

You can set up the equation 6/4 = 12/x and then cross multiply to solve for x

Answer:

Yes, 700 yards bigger than 2000 feet because 700 yards = 2100 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 3 feet in a yard, so that means we need to multiply 700 yards by 3 to get the number of feet there are in 700 yards.

700 yards × 3 feet = 2100 feet

700 yards = 2100 feet

2100 feet > 2000 feet

Answer:

Yes!

Step-by-step explanation:

700 yards is equal to 2100 feet, making it 100 feet longer.

a) Dependent variable: Systolic blood pressure

Independent variable: Age

b) Calculations: xi (age) yi (Systolic blood pressure)xiyi (age × systolic blood pressure)xi^2 (age²)yi^2 (systolic blood pressure²)16 109 1,744 256 11,88125 122 3,050 625 14,88439 143 5,577 1,521 20,44949 199 9,751 2,401 39,60122 118 2,596 484 13,92457 175 9,975 3,249 30,62522 118 2,596 484 13,92464 185 11,840 4,096 34,22570 199 13,930 4,900 39,601∑x = 561∑y = 1,450∑xy = 61,059∑x² = 19,200∑y² = 249,141r = [9 (∑xy) - (∑x)(∑y)] / sqrt([9∑x² - (∑x)²][9∑y² - (∑y)²]) = 0.664- The correlation is moderate positive. As age increases, systolic blood pressure also increases.

c) R² = r² = 0.4416- 44.16% of the variability in systolic blood pressure is explained by age.

d) Regression Equation: y = a + bx where a = (y mean) - b (x mean) Using the means x mean = 62.3 and y mean = 161.1a = (161.1) - b (62.3)a = 33.62y = 33.62 + 1.083x

The regression equation is y = 33.62 + 1.083x.

e) Predicting the blood pressure of a 50-year-old man:y = 33.62 + 1.083xy = 33.62 + 1.083(50)y = 33.62 + 54.15y = 87.77

The predicted blood pressure is 87.77.

To know more about mean refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14532771

#SPJ11