The attempted invasion of Cuba by Cuban exiles was known as-
A The Cuban Missile Crisis
B The Bay of Pigs
CThe U-2 Incident
DThe Falkland Island Invasion​

Answer:

It has to have been Rutherford B. Hayes.

Explanation:

It has been said that he was the 19th president of the United States in 1877-1881.

Note to you:

Hope this helped and have a good one!

Answer:

he suffered from acute porphyria wich was a genetic blood disorder, and bipolar disorder

Explanation:

sources www.express.co.uk and www.history.com hope this helps

Answer: A.

Explanation:

Just Took The Test its Correct i promise

Answer:

Many enlisted men

Explanation:

Answer: B

Explanation:

The main social impact of the result of Brown v. Board of Education was that B) It strengthened the growing civil rights movement.

This gave a massive boost to the Civil Rights movement as they then began to argue that if segregation was unconstitutional in education, it should be unconstitutional across the board.

Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at https://brainly.com/question/9857823.

Answer:

In October 1962, the Soviet provision of ballistic missiles to Cuba led to the most dangerous Cold War confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union and brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Over the course of two extremely tense weeks, US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev negotiated a peaceful outcome to the crisis. The crisis evoked fears of nuclear destruction, revealed the dangers of brinksmanship, and invigorated attempts to halt the arms race.

Explanation: Sorry I got into it haha;)...But there you go...

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Displaced persons suffer significantly higher rates of mortality than the general population. They also remain at high risk of physical attack, sexual assault and abduction, and frequently are deprived of adequate shelter, food and health services.

Answer:

Appellate brief

An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.

Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).

Student brief

A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.

Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.

The parties and how to keep track of them

Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:

Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.

The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.

The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.

For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.

These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.

A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.

A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.

The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.

When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.

At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”

In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.

Student briefs

Explanation:

Answer:

D. They helped explain his ideas through simple stories that were easy for everybody to understand.

Explanation:

Answer: Peisistratus

Explanation:

Answer:

Ephors

Explanation:

Ephors- were the people responsible for the day to day operation of the government.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

i dont know if its correct but i hope it helps

Answer: The nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw the tremendous growth of the aptly named ''Big Three'' North Carolina industries—tobacco, textiles, and furniture. The manufacture of the many products related to these industries grew naturally from the availability of raw materials in the state.

Explanation:

Answer:

All of them but "give official approval doc"

Explanation:

do hope this helps.

Answer:

The answer is ADE

A(defending the laws of the state in court)

D(serving as the head of the Department of Justice)

E(advising or assisting on criminal cases as needed)

Explanation:

The attorney is head of LEGAL officer of state.

I used guided notes and got this question right.

Answer:

Sole Proprietorship

Explanation:

A sole proprietorship is the most common form of business organization.

Answer:

The process of industrialization is known as the revolution because it brings new industries and development in a quick session, and also opens up the gate for the other countries to do partnership with the specific country.

Explanation:

thanks me later

Answer:       C

Explanation: Tobacco was a cash crop first discoverde in the new world

Answer: This is a very controversial topic  but can be learned from. Donald J. Trump built the wall for protection around America. Many Mexican immigrants have been crossing illegally with no passport or identification. Many had one goal and that was to move to a better place where they are free with their families.  Others had a goal, that was to smuggle illegal things into America for other American drug dealers and weapon dealers. It was a good move on the presidents part and saved us a whole lot of damage. Yes, it may have affected the Mexican immigrants but because of their actions this wall had to be put up. Now don't get me wrong there are many good well manured Mexican people and I have nothing against them. The wall was really meant for the people who wanted to do harm to America and had no right to be here.

Explanation:

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Answer:

Positive Effects of the Industrial Revolution The Industrial Revolution led to inventions of new machinery and production processes. Such new inventions made production faster and more economical. For example, the invention of the assembly line helped to make production easier through division of labor and specialization. Due to the more efficient production processes, industries were able to manufacture more products at an economical rate. This resulted in an overall drop in the prices of products. For example, mechanization of production processes enabled 24-hour factory operation and thus the manufacture of more products.

In the Industrial Revolution period, society in general developed a thirst for knowledge and innovation. Renowned scholars carried out research in different scientific fields, resulting in new scientific proofs and inventions. These inventions are still used today in the fields of medicine, science and agriculture with minor improvisations. For example, the light bulb, the X-ray and the telephone were all invented during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution paved the way for new inventions and designs. This led to an increase in the number of new factories and associated industries. Hence, more job opportunities were opened up in urban areas.

Because more people had access to jobs and business opportunities, overall quality of life increased. In this regard, larger populations of society could access quality education, modern housing, improved health services and faster transport services.

Negative Effects of the Industrial Revolution An increase in the number of factories in urban areas resulted in more air, water and land pollution. These industries operated without much government oversight and were not held accountable for their actions. Pollution exposed factory workers and the general population to health risks. Although companies work to reduce it, industrial pollution is still a major problem in the modern world. During the Industrial Revolution, factories and other employers were more profit oriented at the expense of employee safety and welfare. In this regard, it was not uncommon for employees to suffer serious but preventable accidents while on the production lines.

The Industrial Revolution caused mass migrations from rural areas to cities as people were in search of better jobs. The reduced labor workforce in rural areas could not sustain the demand for food coming from the local populations. In this regard, there was a perennial shortage of food due to reduced farming activities. The migration of people from rural areas to urban areas caused an oversupply of labor in some cities. Such an oversupply of labor prompted some employers to pay their employees low wages. In addition, employers exploited cheap child labor in order to maximize their profits. Even though the general population experienced improvements in its quality of life, some uneducated factory laborers lived in crowded slums with no basic amenities such as clean water. This resulted in the occasional outbreak of sanitation-related diseases.

Explanation:

pls mark brainliest

Answer:

Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.

Explanation:

Answer:

C:

Explanation:

Which statement describes the state of leadership in the later Ming dynasty?

The people took advantage of the rulers’ kindness.

Leaders were older and easily influenced by the young.

The emperors lived in poverty and declined in social status.

Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.

Answer:

3

Explanation:

if you divide 7 and 21 you get 3 groups and if you 7x3 is 21

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

They love them to