the drawing below shows the dimensions of skims kite what is the area of Kim's kite ​

Answer:

2: add 4

3: 6

5: multiply by 2

6: 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D = +/- 12.041 units

Step-by-step explanation:

D =

[tex] \sqrt{} (x2 - x1) {}^{2} + (y2 - y1) {}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{} ( - 5 - 4) {}^{2} + (3 - ( - 5)) {}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{81 + 64} [/tex]

[tex] \sqrt{145} [/tex]

D = +/- 12.041 units

Answer:

960

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

The relation is:

[tex]\{(1, 2), (3, 5), (-2, 2), (3,6)\}[/tex]

To find:

The pair of coordinates that clarify why this relation is not a function.

Solution:

A relation is called a function if there exist unique y-value for each x-value. In other words, if a relation has two outputs for a single input, then the relation is not a function.

The given relation is:

[tex]\{(1, 2), (3, 5), (-2, 2), (3,6)\}[/tex]

This relation has two y-values 5 and 6 for a single x-value 3. Since the y-value is not unique all all values of x, therefore the relation is not a function.

Hence, the pairs of coordinates (3,5) and (3,6) clarify that the given relation is not a function.

Answer:

B. Between x 2 and x 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 60° (Alternate angles)

Step-by-step explanation:

a) x = 60°

b) Reason: Alternate angles

Answer:x=60

Step-by-step explanation: all angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees, x is the same as the angle next to it, therefore x=60 degrees

the answer to the question is 0.1

Answer:

1/10 or 0.1

Step-by-step explanation:

You first rewrite the problem as 2/5÷4/1. Then you flip the second fraction for multiplication: 2/5*1/4. Now you multiply both numerators and denominators to get a final total of 2/20 which equals 1/10 or 0.1.

Answer:

4x+7 I believe but it could be wrong

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

so you need to do 8.32 x 10=83.2

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

OOPS I MEANT 18 I WASNT PAYING ATTENTION LOL

Answer:

Yes it had two circular bases and a curved lateral surface.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes it doesn't

Step-by-step explanation:

hope dis helps

[tex]\mathfrak{\huge{\orange{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}[/tex]

Actually Welcome to the concept of Geometric Progression.

So, we know that,

GP = a.r^(n-1)

here, a = 4 and r = -2

so we get as,

an = 4.(-2)^n-1

Option B.) is correct

Answer: It’s adjacent I’ll draw what vertical is. And M is 180-106 which is 74. Adjacent means next to...

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

33π is the answer in terms of pi.

Step-by-step explanation:

Circumference of circle formula is C=πd.

Plug in the given values. We put 33 into d, because d represents diameter, and diameter is twice the radius(16.5), so we multiply 16.5 by 2. So far we have C=(π)(33).

C=(π)(33)=33π

Answer:

The answer selected is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Acute because all angles are less than 90

Answer:

50 + 75 = 125

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

                 |              1 -H        |       2-H          |       Total

Green       |           170            |          x           |       y      

Purple       |            z              |       284          |       w        

Total         |            430          |          v            |      852      

Correct choice is B

Answer:

Angle J and angle MJK or maybe right angle....

These are the three ways...

Hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9.5 or 9 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

if their is a remainder ur answer is

9^r1

Answer:

Please have a look.........

Step-by-step explanation:

...............................

Answer:

if this is factoring i wanna say

x= -7

x= 8

but i could be wrong this is a trick 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C 28 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

16 ÷ 8 = 2

14 × 2 = 28 cm

Answer:

the perimeter is 11cm and the area is 7cm^2

Step-by-step explanation:

NP =PS, meaning they have the same length. so the perimeter is 3.5 + 4 + another 3.5.

For the area imagine you cut the triangle in half. from P to the middle of NS. Put the 2 triangle halves together to form a rectangle. (PS is now touching NP). This would be a 2x 3.5 rectangle. 2x 3.5 is 7, meaning both this imagined rectangle and the triangle have an area of 7cm^2.

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

a right triangle is 90° so

76+(x-6)=90°

-76 -76

(x-6)=24

+6 +6

x=30

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a parabola in vertex form is

y = a(x - h)² + k

where (h, k) are the coordinates of the vertex and a is a multiplier

To obtain this form use the method of completing the square.

Given

f(x) = - 0.6x² + 4.2x + 240 ← factor out - 0.6 from the first 2 terms

     = - 0.6(x² - 7x) + 240

To complete the square

add/ subtract ( half the coefficient of the x- term)² to x² - 7x

f(x) = - 0.6(x² + 2(- 3.5)x + 12.25 - 12.25 ) + 240

      = - 0.6 (x - 3.5)² + 7.35 + 240

     = - 0.6(x - 3.5)² + 247.35

with vertex = (3.5, 247.35 )

The maximum value is the y- coordinate of the vertex

Then

f(x) = - 0.6(x - 3.5)² + 247.35 has a maximum value of 247.35

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

The following is based on information from The Wolf in the Southwest: The making of an Endangered Species by David E. Brown ( University of Arizona Press). Before 1918the proportion of female wolves in the general population of all southwestern wolves was about 50%. However, after 1918, southwestern cattle ranchers began a widespread effort to destroy wolves. In a recent sample of 34 wolves, there were only 10 females. One theory is that male wolves tend to return sooner than females to their old territories where their predecessors were exterminated. Do these data indicate that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region? Use ∝ = 0.01

Answer:

Since p-value (0.0082) < ∝ ( 0.01 ), we reject null hypothesis.

Therefore, at 0.01 significance level, we have sufficient evidence that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than ( 0.5 ) 50% in the region.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Hypothesis;

H₀ : p ≥ 0.5   { 50% }

H₁ : p < 0.5

This is a lower tailed test { H₁ : p < 0.5 }

sample size n = 34

number of female wolves x = 10

sample proportion p" = x / n = 10 / 34 = 0.2941176

claimed proportion P = 0.5

significance level ∝ = 0.01

we determine the standard deviation of p"

σ[tex]_{p"[/tex] = √[ (p(1 - p)) / n ] = √[ (0.5(1 - 0.5)) / 34 ]

= √[ (0.5 ×0.5) / 34 ]

σ[tex]_{p"[/tex] = 0.08575

Test statistics

[tex]z_{observed[/tex] = (p" - 0.5) / σ[tex]_{p"[/tex]

[tex]z_{observed[/tex] = (0.2941176 - 0.5) / 0.08575

[tex]z_{observed[/tex] = -2.40

so

Test statistic : -2.40  

Since its a lower tailed test;

P-value = P( Z < [tex]z_{observed[/tex] ) = P( Z < -2.40 ) = 0.0082

Rejection criteria: Reject H₀ if p-value < ∝

Decision:

Since p-value (0.0082) < ∝ ( 0.01 ), we reject null hypothesis.

Therefore, at 0.01 significance level, we have sufficient evidence that the population proportion of of female wolves is now less than ( 0.5 ) 50% in the region.