Answer:
c
Explanation:
In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court hold that the defendant has the right to counsel during the course of any police interrogation
In Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment bars the police from initiating any interrogation of a defendant who has been formally charged and who has requested the right to counsel.
A case has reached the Supreme Court, but not as a matter of appeal. How did it most likely get there
Answer:
Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.
Explanation:
.....
The executive branch, headed by the (fill in blank)
includes numerous executive departments that carry out or enforce laws passed by (fill in blank).
The executive branch is headed by the president. They enforce laws passed by Congress.
The president is in control of things like the army and is in control of enforcing laws passed by congress.
I hope this helps! :)
when does the supreme court have original jurisdiction over a case?
In 1857, the supreme court ruled in the dred scott decision that:
Answer:
The Court decided Dred Scott in 1817 at a time when political tensions about slavery ran high. In that case, the Supreme Court held that no African-American could be a citizen entitled to sue in federal court and that no African-American could become free simply because he was taken into a free state by his owner.
Explanation:
Answer: Slaves had no rights and that they were considered property.
The Second Amendment is an important part of the Constitution. For this assignment you will need to read the Second Amendment and the secondary source Know Your Rights: A Guide to the United States Constitution to help you answer the following prompt:
“Does the text of the Second Amendment mean that the right to 'bear arms' is unlimited?”
As you prepare to answer this prompt you should follow the format provided below.
Paragraph 1 - Analyze the text of the Second Amendment for yourselves. In order to analyze you should look at each word in the amendment and decide how each part of the amendment relates to the prompt.
Paragraph 2 - Summarize and cite the ideas and information from the secondary sources to provide support for your conclusion in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 3 – Summarize and cite the ideas and information in the secondary sources that go against your conclusions in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 4 – Write an analysis about the strength of the arguments that support or counter their own opinions. You will need to provide an explanation of your thinking about which opinions are stronger by citing specific textual evidence out of the primary and secondary sources.
Answer:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime
to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of
handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms
unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin
the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing
requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in
the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the
use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed
the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second
Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and
that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that
firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for
Explanation:
I have been passing classes because of this
Answer:brainly
Explanation: we are s.t.u.p.i.d
What is a Bureaucracy?
a. The Constitution and the three branches of government
b. All of the agencies, people, and procedures that make the government operate
c. The Senate and House
d. The President and his advisors
Answer:
Letter A
Explanation:
#Carry me on learning
What is the most common form of direct democracy?.
Answer:
A delegation of power from the federal government to state governments, increasing state and local sovereignty
Explanation:
ANSWER PLS
Question 11
Education
1 pts
A common criticism of the Supreme Court regarding its
willingness to strike down laws made by elected officials,
as well as to overturn past precedents, is known as:
Center
ing
O Original intent
Eker
O Judicial activism
O Judicial prudence
O Judicial restraint
Answer:
it's B I think I don't know man I'm just a kid and life is a nightmare
What is advanced gastric cancer?
Answer:
A cancer that begins in the stomach and has spread to at least one other part of the body, such as the liver or lungs.
Explanation:
A person seeking to overturn a decision by a state's highest court by taking the case to the lowest level of the federal court system would begin at which court
Answer:
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
Explanation:
If a grand jury issues an indictment against a defendant, the defendant then appears in court to answer the indictment in a proceeding called the _____.
Answer:
Answer:
safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
Explanation:
The sum of the forces on either side is the same, the only difference is the radius of curvature and speed.
Also given that r_1= smaller radius
r_2= larger radius curve
r_2= 2r_1..............i
let u be the speed of larger radius curve
now, \sum F = \frac{mv^2}{r_1} =\frac{mu^2}{r_2}∑F=
r
1
mv
2
=
r
2
mu
2
................ii
form i and ii we can write
v^2= \frac{1}{2} u^2v
2
=
2
1
u
2
⇒u= √2 v
therefore, safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v
If a grand jury issues an indictment against a defendant, the defendant then appears in court to answer the indictment in a proceeding called the Arraignment .
What Is an Arraignment?
Arraignment is a court proceeding in which the defendant is read the charges in the indictment, and is asked to enter a plea. The arraignment occurs after the defendant is arrested and formal charges are levied.
Arraignment is a formal reading of a criminal charging document in the presence of the defendant, to inform them of the charges against them. In response to arraignment, the accused is expected to enter a plea. Acceptable pleas vary among jurisdictions, but they generally include "guilty", "not guilty", and the peremptory pleas, or pleas in bar, setting out reasons why a trial cannot proceed. Pleas of nolo contendere ("no contest") and the Alford plea are allowed in some circumstances.
Learn more about Arraignment on:
brainly.com/question/14919926
#SPJ2
Roscoe Pound, Dean of Harvard Law School from 1916 to 1936 said, “The law must be stable but it must not stand still.” One way to interpret his meaning is that a _____.
system of law must have a method to change the laws as often as possible
system of law that is designed to adapt to society through principles such as common law and precedent is a stronger system
system of laws that are inconsistent and change often is a healthy system
system of laws must have a method to make sure that laws do not change often
system of laws that is designed to adapt through principles such as common law and precedent is not a stable system
Answer:system of law that is designed to adapt to society through principles such as common law and precedent is a stronger system
Explanation:
tell me if you need an Explanation:
Explain how the required interactions of the house and the senate would be required to move hr 5048 into law.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
...............................
what can congress do if the supreme court declares a law unconstitutional
Answer:
The law is nullified
Explanation:
Congress can get around a Court ruling by passing a new law or changing a law ruled unconstitutional.
Congress can modify the law or create a new one. This way they can dodge the unconstitutional declaration.
I hope this helps! :)
What amendment allowed women to vote.
Answer:
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Explanation:
what is one of the purposes of hunting laws and regulations
in a court opinion this term is used to describe the courts answer to the issue it was asked to dcide
Answer:
a judicial opinion :)
Explanation:
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
What are two facts about the president cabinet
Answer:
What are the two main roles of the President Cabinet?
The two roles of the Cabinet secretaries are to advise the president and serve as the administrative head of his/her department.
Explanation:
"to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other power vested by this constitution. " alexander hamilton used the clause above to.
The clause was used by Alexander Hamilton in order to convince the federal government to create the First Bank of the United States.
Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman and was also one of the founding fathers. He was influential and was a promoter of the United States constitution.
One of the vital clauses in the Constitution was "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers". This law was used by Alexander Hamilton when he wanted the first bank to be created.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25685887
the establishment clause of the first amendment has often been interpreted to mean
Answer:
freedom of religion, expression, assembly, press and right to petition the government.
Explanation:
A FIRETWUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alma Tirtsche (1921)
Alma Tirtsche's beaten body was found wrapped in a blanket in what is known as Gun
Alley in Melbourne, Australia. Because the body was relatively free of blood, the police
deduced that she had been murdered elsewhere and brought to the alley. Ger body had
been washed before being wrapped in the blanket. A local bar owner, Colin Ross, was
questioned. Ross admitted seeing Tirtsche in his bar earlier in the day.
Investigators collected blankets from Ross's home and found several strands of long,
reddish blonde hair on them. The length of the hair implied it had come from a female,
and the concentration of pigment in the hair implied a younger woman. Some of the
ends of the hair were irregular, implying the hair had been forcibly broken off. The
physical similarity of the hair found on the blanket with that of Alma Tirtschke convinced
the jury that Ross was the murderer. This was the first time that hair was used to secure
a conviction in Australia. Unfortunately, analysis of the hairs 75 years later showed that
two of the strands found on the blankets came from different individuals, which throws
doubt on Ross's guilt.
3. What other characteristics of the hair could the investigators have examined
(besides the length and color) to determine if they had come from the same
person, and that that person was Tirtsche?
The other characteristics of the hair that could be examined are genetic analysis of Alma Tirtsche's hair and the strands.
Who is Alma Tirtsche?The Gun Alley Murder occurred in Melbourne, Australia, in 1921 when 12-year-old Alma Tirtschke was raped and killed. Due to the fact that she went to Hawthorn West High School and was last seen alive near a bar, the Australian Wine Saloon, her murder generated a lot of media attention.
The case has gained notoriety more subsequently for being a miscarriage of justice. Colin Campbell Ross, then 29 years old, was found guilty of killing Tirtschke and put to death, but he maintained his innocence all the way to the end. Ross's innocence was established by DNA evidence when the case was reexamined decades later, and he was given a posthumous pardon in 2008. Since Ross's arrest, Tirtschke's family has maintained that Ross is innocent and that the proper person was found guilty of killing Tirtschke.
To learn more about genetic analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28265289
#SPJ9
one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws
Answer:
One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
Martin Luther King Jr. said that.
WHAT IS UNDERCOVER ASSIGNMENT
Answer:
In policing/law, undercover operations/assignments involve investigators infiltrating criminal networks or posing as offenders in order to reveal organized crime activity. These operations take place in a variety of nations, with varying levels of oversight. In short, undercover operations entail secrecy.
A challenge to the array is used by judges to bar real evidence from the criminal trial. True or False
Answer:
false
Explanation:
what is law? what is the main function of law
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Answer:
Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it protects us from our own Government
Explanation:
Guy above me is right! Thanks guy who answerd before me! :D
Which law or act requires inmates to exhaust all internal administrative grievance procedures before they can file a civil rights case in federal court