Alonso read the underlined metaphor in the following
passage from a narrative text:
“As the two friends crept across the grass, branches from
the low-hanging trees grabbed at their arms. The wind
sighed in the treetops, and high overhead, the moon was a
pale fingernail."
How should Alonso explain the impact of the metaphor on
the tone of the text?
Answers
Answer:
D, I believe it is.
Explanation:
It makes sense to be the correct answer to highlight the livelyness of the environment.
Answer:
d !
Explanation: i hope this helps i just took the quiz !
Related Questions
Choose the words that can be used as a transition showing a conclusion. But And Therefore Thus However Than Then 2. I must cite a source in my paper when I ____. Use a direct quote from it Discuss it Refer to it Paraphrase it Summarize it Think about it Use my own ideas Use common knowledge Look at it funny Use someone else's ideas
Answers
Answer:
1. Therefore, However and Then
2. Refer to it, Paraphrase it, Summarize it, Use someone else's ideas
Explanation:
1. "Therefore", "However" and "Then" are words that indicate that you are finalizing a thought by concluding on all the facts, evidence and arguments addressed in relation to a given subject. These words should always be used in an essay or speech at the time the author's position is being finalized and a resolution is being applied.
2. You must cite the sources of research in an article whenever you use elements written by other authors or even mention those elements or the author. This prevents you from committing plagiarism and allows your work to be considered correct and legal. In summary, you should cite the sources whenever you refer to it, paraphrase it, summarize it or use someone else's ideas
What is the theme of I will live in the past present and the future
Answers
Answer:
Future robots
past just do the lord of the rings
Explanation:
Answer:
the expression means that you will keep an eye on your future think kindly about the past and live in the present
Explanation:
Which is one way the author connects the readers to the past in "A Friend in Need"? She places historical events in a modern setting. She reports only true events from the time period. She uses dialogue that is true to the time period. She places historical events in an imaginary setting.
Answers
Answer:
She uses dialogue that is true to the time period.
Explanation:
To complete this exercise, you have to read the story "A friend in need" and then select the correct answer, which is "she uses dialogue that is true to the time period" because when she starts telling the story about this man that she met once, she says the dialogues in a way that you feel like you are there although it was years ago.
For example:
"Do you know Turner?" said Burton as I nodded a greeting.
"I've met him at the club. I'm told he's a remittance man."
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Calm, gentle, passionless, as he appeared, there was yet, we
fear, a quiet depth of malice, hitherto ________, but active now, in
this unfortunate old man, which led him to imagine a more
intimate revenge than any mortal had ever wreaked upon an
enemy.
Source: The Scarlet Letter
A. momentous
B. latent
C. fanciful
D. ponderous
Answers
The plot of “Hercules” is driven by specific events that take place. Write an essay analyzing how the passage draws on elements commonly found in myths. Use evidence from the passage Hercules to support your response. (it's by Ron Clements, also its a TDA a text dependant analysis essay )
Answers
Answer: (sorry if this isn't good enough, I know so little of Greek and Roma old history)
Hercules, a roman and Greek god from roman mythology and past, Hercules a man that was and still is one of the most famous Greco-Roman legendary heroes. Son of Zeus, and a slayer of beats,
this man has dozen and more stories about him, to slaying the The Nemean lion. The Nemean lion was a vicious monster to the Greeks, slay and scarified to Zeus by The famous Hercules
and the well known story of the The Capture of Cerberus
or known as the Three-headed dog, a short tempted mammal, All through He, Hercules, didn't slay such a beast, he returned the beast the king, Hera at his palace but turns out Zeus was there, and he grants Hercules immortality. He was very proud of his son, and Then was access to go the heavens.
but these characters Hercules, Athena, Helen of Troy, many beasts and etc. are all going around the character Zeus, his son, and these other godly beings
Choose the sentence that uses correct grammar.
a Not knowing what to do with her time, Amy went to the library.
b Wanting to run a marathon soon, new running shoes were needed.
c Feeling exciting for Damari's party, it was hard to fall asleep.
d After just putting a coat of paint on the house, it began to rain.
Answers
Answer:
it might be A... try that
Explanation:
Read the following passage.
About 3 million people have to look for a place to sleep at night. Some homeless people have jobs but do not earn nearly enough money for both food and shelter. Some become homeless because they have an unfortunate accident or lose their job. They do not have any back up resources to make it through the hard times. The homeless face terrible problems. Many become victims of violence. Serious health problems may begin because they are exposed to bad weather and unclean conditions. Homeless children may miss the chance to go to school. Worst of all, some cities pass laws that make it even harder on the homeless.
Which of the following best exemplifies the tone of the passage?
Elated
Enraged
Stressful
Compassionate
Answers
the answer to your question is stressful
What do you think of trust as? I am writing an essay on trust, and I already wrote a few, but I need some more things that I think of trust as.
Answers
Answer:
I believe trust is a lot of things!!
trust is giving someone the keys to drive
trust is a parent letting their child go to a party
trust is confidence in a persons integrity
trust is your boss allowing you to close by yourself
Explanation:
these are just a few examples! I hope they help!!!!
DIRECTIONS: Read the paragraphs below.
Then, answer the questions that follow.
Jogging is more than exercise. Jogging causes the body to produce a group of hormones called endorphins. These hormones may then release natural painkillers that can reduce suffering from arthritis, allergies, or other ailments. Jogging might actually trigger relief from pain and help ward off the common cold.
Jogging can build not only muscles but also confidence. A program of regular jogging enables a runner to complete run after run while becoming stronger and more self-assured. A bonus can be increased self-esteem through weight loss and better body image. Sustained running also requires self-discipline, which can benefit a runner’s ability to stay with a task to completion.
1. Which sentence in the first paragraph directly states the writer’s claim about jogging?
2. What is the main point, or reason, of the second paragraph?
3. List three specific details the writer presents as evidence.
Answers
Answer:
1) "Jogging is more than exercise"
2) The second paragraph is explaining the second reason to why jogging is more than exercise
3)
"Jogging causes the body to produce a group of hormones called endorphins" (shows how jogging can help with arthritis, etc.)
"A bonus can be increased self-esteem through weight loss and better body image" (shows how jogging can increase confidence)
"Sustained running also requires self-discipline, which can benefit a runner's ability to stay with a task to completion." (shows how jogging can increase confidence)
Explanation:
for number 1:
"Jogging is more than exercise" is the writer's claim because usually the first sentence of the paragraph explains what they think, and the rest is why they think what they think (evidence and explanation of evidence).
for number 2:
The paragraphs to explain the writer's reasoning behind their claim in general, so naturally the second paragraph is just that, the second reasoning behind why the writer thinks jogging is more than exercise.
for number 3:
Evidence and explanation of evidence is what makes up the middle of every body paragraph in essays, so it's just a matter of seeing which sentences are the evidence and which are the explanations of evidence. I'm not sure about the third evidence I put, but I think it's right.
This passage discusses the benefits of jogging beyond just exercise. The first paragraph explains how jogging can trigger relief from pain and reduce suffering from certain ailments. The second paragraph highlights how jogging can build confidence, self-esteem, and self-discipline.
What is a paragraph?A paragraph is a group of related sentences that focus on a single main idea or topic. It is a unit of writing in which a writer expresses a complete thought or idea. A well-written paragraph contains a topic sentence that states the main idea, supporting sentences that provide evidence or examples, and a concluding sentence that ties the ideas together. Paragraphs are used in both fiction and non-fiction writing and are an essential component of effective communication in written form. They help to organize ideas and make writing easier to read and understand.
Here in the Question,
1. The sentence that directly states the writer's claim about jogging in the first paragraph is: "Jogging might actually trigger relief from pain and help ward off the common cold."
2. The main point, or reason, of the second paragraph is that jogging can build not only muscles but also confidence, self-esteem, and self-discipline.
3. Three specific details the writer presents as evidence are: (1) a program of regular jogging enables a runner to complete run after run while becoming stronger and more self-assured; (2) sustained running can lead to increased self-esteem through weight loss and better body image; and (3) self-discipline required for sustained running can benefit a runner's ability to stay with a task to completion.
Therefore, This passage emphasizes jogging's advantages that go beyond health benefits. The first paragraph describes how jogging might cause pain alleviation and lessen suffering from specific illnesses. The second paragraph emphasizes how jogging can increase self-discipline, confidence, and self-worth.
To learn about context clues click:
brainly.com/question/3072385
#SPJ2
How does the author expand his
argument in paragraphs 7-8?
Answers
Answer:
dum
Explanation:
Two heads are better than one. what figurative language is this
Answers
Answer: This is an example of an IDIOM
Read the following excerpt from “Raymond’s Run” and answer the question.
You’d think my mother’d be grateful not to have to make me a white organdy dress with a big satin sash and buy me new white baby-doll shoes that can’t be taken out of the box till the big day.
What is the meaning of the word "organdy" as it is used in this passage?
cotton fabric
sparkly fabric
wrinkled fabric
lightweight fabric
Answers
Answer:
lightweight fabric
Explanation: What is organdy made of?
A lightweight, sheer, stiff fabric, usually made of cotton, and used for collars, cuffs, aprons and on the inside of garments to stiffen them.
Answer:
A cotton fabric
Explanation:
What type of sentence is this sentence? We can only speak of people Whose roots in America are older or newer.
a. simple
b. compound
c. complex
d. compound-complex
Answers
what is 3 + 3 + 3? just wondering
Answers
Explanation: 3+3 is 6 the 6+3 is 9
Answer:
It's 9
Explanation:
noelle was the first person to arrive
which word or phrase does the refer to?
Answers
Answer: the first person?
I’m not 100% sure what the questions asking
Explanation:
Which word describes what scientists hope other scientists will do with their experiments, once they share them?
a. replicate
b. communicate
c. associate
d. repudiate
Answers
Answer:B
Mark me brainliest if this helps,
Until the past decade, scientists, research institutions, and government agencies relied solely on a system of self-regulation based on shared ethical principles and generally accepted research practices to ensure integrity in the research process. Among the very basic principles that guide scientists, as well as many other scholars, are those expressed as respect for the integrity of knowledge, collegiality, honesty, objectivity, and openness. These principles are at work in the fundamental elements of the scientific method, such as formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment to test the hypothesis, and collecting and interpreting data. In addition, more particular principles characteristic of specific scientific disciplines influence the methods of observation; the acquisition, storage, management, and sharing of data; the communication of scientific knowledge and information; and the training of younger scientists.1 How these principles are applied varies considerably among the several scientific disciplines, different research organizations, and individual investigators.
The basic and particular principles that guide scientific research practices exist primarily in an unwritten code of ethics. Although some have proposed that these principles should be written down and formalized,2 the principles and traditions of science are, for the most part, conveyed to successive generations of scientists through example, discussion, and informal education. As was pointed out in an early Academy report on responsible conduct of research in the Suggested Citation:"2 SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH PRACTICES." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1864.×
Add a note to your bookmark
health sciences, “a variety of informal and formal practices and procedures currently exist in the academic research environment to assure and maintain the high quality of research conduct” (IOM, 1989a, p. 18).
Physicist Richard Feynman invoked the informal approach to communicating the basic principles of science in his 1974 commencement address at the California Institute of Technology (Feynman, 1985):
[There is an] idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school—we never explicitly say what this is, but just hope that you catch on by all the examples of scientific investigation. It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked—to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.
Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can—if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong—to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. In summary, the idea is to try to give all the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution, not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another. (pp. 311-312)
Many scholars have noted the implicit nature and informal character of the processes that often guide scientific research practices and inference.3 Research in well-established fields of scientific knowledge, guided by commonly accepted theoretical paradigms and experimental methods, involves few disagreements about what is recognized as sound scientific evidence. Even in a revolutionary scientific field like molecular biology, students and trainees have learned the basic principles governing judgments made in such standardized procedures as cloning a new gene and determining its sequence.
In evaluating practices that guide research endeavors, it is important to consider the individual character of scientific fields. Research fields that yield highly replicable results, such as ordinary organic chemical structures, are quite different from fields such as cellular immunology, which are in a much earlier stage of development and accumulate much erroneous or uninterpretable material before the pieces fit together coherently. When a research field is too new or too fragmented to support consensual paradigms or established methods, different scientific practices can emerge
Answer:
Either A or B
Explanation:
Once a scientist has finished with their experiment, Other scientists usually repeat the experiment to see if it's correct, and usually talk about it and see, if it's wrong, what could be done to fix it.
PLEASE ANSWER!!! which statement best describes what roosevelt means by partnership in this passage
Answers
Answer:
c. Government oversight to uphold agreement and prevent unfair practices in farming industry and the workers employed in these sectors.
Explanation:
In his "Fi re side Ch ats", President R o os e v el t used the opportunity to address and discuss the numerous problems faced by the country. And in addressing the fears and concerns of the American people, he also used the platform to inform and re-assure them of the numerous works and solutions that his administration had done to get such problems solved.
In the given excerpt from his May 7 1933 address, President Roosevelt used the term "partnership" in describing the role of the government in taking control over "farming and industry and transportation". The use of this particular word is to show the agreement and oversight of the government in trying to prevent unfair practices in the farming industry and that the workers are given employment too. He stated that "[it is] not a partnership in profits, for the profits would still go to the citizens, but rather a partnership in planning and partnership to see that the plans are carried out."
Thus, the correct answer is option c.
Answer: C. Government oversight to uphold agreements and prevent unfair practices in farming, industry, and the workers employed in these sectors.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP!!!! ILL MAKE YOU BRILLIANT
Answers
Answer:
1. Collide
2. possession
3. introduce
4. discuss
5. estimate
6. instruct
7. estimation
8. possess
9. introduction
10. collision
Explanation:
what is the reader opinion, and which evidence BEST supports it?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
It is a true statement, backed up with reasonable, and correct, evidence.
What quote from "All Summer in a Day" is the best evidence to show the children's frenzied excitement?
Question 7 options:
"They turned on themselves, like a feverish wheel, all tumbling spokes."
"It's stopping, it's stopping!"
"Do the scientists really know?"
"They stood looking at the door. . . "
PLEASE ANSWER ASAP I NEED THIS TODAY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
3 or 4 one
i read all summer in a day and those two make most sense to me
sorry if it wrong
Answer:
"They stood looking at the door"
Explanation:
If this is not correct I am sorry I have not read the book.
Think of some examples of informal writing or a conversation you can recall well. Describe how clearly they express a unified point of view, tone, and purpose. Compare them to at least one formal informational text. Discuss why you think the two modes of communicating are different or the same.
I AN LITTERILY GIVING OUT 100 POINTS JUST ANSWER IT RIGHT PLEASE
Answers
Answer: Let’s say someone is giving you detailed directions “hey can you help me find where Max’s diner is?” -johns “yeah, you make a left on 76th go straight on the third traffic light make a right on simmons ave and I’ll be in the left side” -Alex.
(sorry if i'm wrong)
:(
which is the best explanation of how the setting helps reveal the theme
Answers
Answer:
if it were me i would say A
Explanation:
Complete the sentences with the correct coordinating conjunction from the box.
yet so or and
a. Teresa is an excellent employee ………………… she always has time to help others.
b. I know you were late for a good reason, …………..….I am going to give you some extra time to finish the exam.
c. Many people have complained about the poor state of extracurricular activities, ……………. no one has volunteered to help improve them.
d. I’m not sure why he acted like that. He may have been upset with us, ………………. maybe he was just tired.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is and,so,yet, or
what personal qualities do you think Wilma Rudolph felt about people's expectations for her ?
Answers
Answer:
haa
Explanation:
why are outsiders misunderstood
Answers
Answer:
outsiders tend to be misjudged and misunderstood because of the way they dress, the things they take interest in, and the way they act, and is "different" from others.
Explanation:
hope this help and can i get brainlyest if possible
Can the need to protect the elephants’ environment be balanced with the need to protect the elephants?
Answers
Answer: Yes and it should.
Explanation: If the elephants have no safe enviornment to inhabit, there is no point in protecting the elephants. The elephants need just as much protection as their enviornment.
The following is an example of what?
The sun shines in the sky - A
It shines so very high - A
rhyme scheme
meter
iambic pentameter
elegy
Answers
Answer:
rhyme scheme.
Explanation:
The given lines are an example of rhyme scheme.
A rhyme scheme can be defined as the sound at the end of each verse in a poem. This is a repetitive sound that occurs at the end of each verse in a song or poem. There are various types of rhyme schemes in literature such as internal rhyme, slant rhyme, etc.
In the given lines, the end of each verse rhyme with each other, that is sky and high. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
What can you conclude about Karen from this passage
Answers
How are Badlands National Park and Wind Cave different?
A. Badlands has more cliffs and wildflowers.
B. Wind Cave does not allow camping.
C. Only Badlands is a national park.
D. They are in different states.
Answers
Answer:
A the answer is a.
Explanation:
They are both in SD
Wind caves allows camping.
they are both national parks.
Badlands national park and wind cave are tourist attractions. The false statement is option D.
Badlands has more cliffs and wildflower when compared to wind cave. Badlands park also has a wide variety of wildflowers, which add to the beauty of the place. Wind cave does not have camping, while badlands has great options for camping overnight. Also, Badlands national park is a properly defined national park while wind cave is a national park unit.
The only false statement in the above question is that both are situated in different states. Both of these are situated in South Dakota.
Therefore, in the above question, the false statement is option D.
Learn more about national parks here:
https://brainly.com/question/32120992
#SPJ6
The correct question is:
How are Badlands National Park and Wind Cave different? Find the incorrect statement.
A. Badlands has more cliffs and wildflowers.
B. Wind Cave does not allow camping.
C. Only Badlands is a national park.
D. They are in different states.
PLZ PLZ PLZ HELP I WILL MAK BRAINLIEST - SHARKS' TEETH
Langston Carter
The day we found the sharks' teeth was foggy and cool. Moisture hung in the air so thick you could almost see it sparkling in the dim sunlight. There were days, early in the summer like this one, where it seemed there was more water in the air than in the bay. We had beached the boat and stepped out on the recently cleared spit of land. The ground had a light dusting of white sand over an under layer of dried black mud. It looked like a recently frosted chocolate cake, though the frosting was spread a bit thin for my taste. The ground was solid, but we knew from experience that it was full of fiddler crab holes, and would be underwater at the first super-high tide. Mysteriously, to us anyway, someone wanted to build a house there.
We often came to these spots to look for artifacts. Our beach, our summer home, had been a fishing camp for as long as anyone living could remember. The oldest stories told of travelers coming down to the edge of the sea, lining up to fill their wagon beds with salted fish to take back home. Old decaying cabins still lined the beach. Rotting nets, hung out to dry in the last century, decorated their weathered walls. Their broken faces spun stories in our minds. The fishermen who, tanned and wrinkled from sun and salt, hauled their nets full of splashing mullet in to cheers from the waiting crowds. The bounty of the sea lightened everyone's hearts, and the smell of roasting fish filled the damp air. Women fanned themselves from wagon seats. Children splashed in the shallow edges of the bay. It was a scene we had acted out as youngsters, building an imaginary bridge to a life we would never fully know.
Which of the following correctly describes the narrator of this excerpt, "Sharks' Teeth"?
A) First person recalling a past event
B) Second person telling a present event
C) Third-person limited recalling a past event
D) Third-person omniscient telling a present event
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In most of the stories the narrator is a first person so i think it is A
forgive if wrong