How did the Magna Carta influence future governments? Choose four correct answers.

It allowed feudalism to grow in Europe.
It gave people a voice in the government.
It increased the power of the king and queen.
It helped establish an independent judicial system.
It contained ideas that influenced English common law.
It contained ideas that influenced the US Constitution.

Answer:

He outlawed the sale of provincial governorships , he sponsored the Codex Justinianus as well as having new churches or cathedrals built.

Answer:

The Declaration of Independence included these three major ideas: People have certain Inalienable Rights including Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness. All Men are created equal. Individuals have a civic duty to defend these rights for themselves and others.

Explanation:

Answer: Both living and working conditions were unsafe.

hope this helps ! :)

Explanation:

Answer:

Both living and working conditions were unsafe.

Explanation:

Answer:

too much

Explanation:

thats a lot of damage

Answer:

The Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation. Lincoln recognized that the Emancipation Proclamation would have to be followed by a constitutional amendment in order to guarantee the abolishment of slavery.

Answer:

taxes

Explanation:

they felt like the taxes were unfair to them.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Back in the day Texas’s land was very inexpensive

Answer:Different states had different needs for government to meet. ... When planning for the Constitution, everybody agreed the central government should have more power. False. States were still independent under the Articles.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation: In Judaism, God has been conceived in a variety of ways. Traditionally, Judaism holds that YHWH, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and the national god of the Israelites, delivered the Israelites from slavery in Egypt, and gave them the Law of Moses at biblical Mount Sinai as described in the Torah.

Answer:

The Jewish beileveied in one god only.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hey, so the answer is D. (British leaders limit the ability of colonists to expand westward.)

Explanation:

Hope that helps :)

British leaders limit the ability of colonists to expand westward is the statement best completes the diagram. Hence, option D is correct.

The United States gradually grew westward from the late 18th to the mid-19th centuries. This territorial change drove out the majority of the Native American tribes that had lived there for thousands of years before European colonists arrived.

The United States gradually grew westward from the late 18th to the mid-19th centuries. This territorial change drove out the majority of the Native American tribes that had lived there for thousands of years before European colonists arrived.

The Louisiana Purchase was the beginning of the 19th-century movement of settlers into the American West, which was spurred by the Gold Rush, the Oregon Trail, and the notion of "manifest destiny."

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about westward expansion, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/5217142

#SPJ5

Answer:

Based on the layout and function of various kinds of dwellings used by the Ancient Romans in the cities and countryside, one can know whether the people residing in those dwellings are wealthy or poor.

Explanation:

In Ancient Rome, people used to live either in insulae or domus. These dwellings were suggestive of the people who lived in these layouts whether they were wealthy or poor.

Insulae were the layouts where most of the population in Ancient Rome resided. It was a 3 to 5 storey building where approx 30 to 50 people could live. These buildiings were not strong enough to bear any calamity and were prone to get damage or collapse in such cases.

Whereas, domus were the private homes where wealthy families resided. In domus large wealthy family used to dwell. All the domus were almost structured in similar pattern. A domus usually consisted of many rooms such as bedroom, dining room, living room, and office rooms  in comparison to insulae.

It should be noted that the layout and function of the dwellings can be used in knowing if the individual is poor or wealthy.

In Ancient Rome, it should be noted that the people typically lived in either insulae or domus. Insulae were simply where the majority of the people lived.

On the other hand, domus were the private homes where wealthy families resided. They were typically strong and beautiful.

Therefore, the layout and function of the dwellings can be used in knowing if the individual is poor or wealthy.

Learn more about Romans on:

https://brainly.com/question/751984

color instead of black and white, sound instead of silent movies, animation, sound effects.. those r the main ones I think

Who ever is reading this:

I love u.

U matter.

The world needs u

hang in there ik it may be bad but u deserve the world <3

ur beautiful for who u r, not wht u look like. no matter ur shape, size, color, gender.. anything

don't give up bby i need u to live.

i wish i could take everyones problems so yall wouldn't have to have em but i cant so just know ily and if anyone needs to talk u can talk to me

Pls pass this on. Everyone deserves to know this. ♥️♥️

just copy and paste its not hard pls this could save someones life

Answer:

The U.S. Constitution is full of checks and balances of the three branches of government. The best example of checks and balances is that the president can veto any bill passed by Congress, but a two-thirds vote in Congress can override the veto. Congress has the power to set and collect any taxes or duties.

Explanation:

Answer: explore

Magellan did not conquer any land, so that option is not the answer. Convert does not fit in this sentence, so this option is not the answer. Circumstance does not fit in the sentence, so the answer must be explore.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The Quartering Act

Explanation:

The Quartering Act required colonists to not only house soldiers, but to cook for them and basically give them everything they need.

Answer:

This expansion led to debates about the fate of slavery in the West, increasing tensions between the North and South that ultimately led to the collapse of American democracy and a brutal civil war.

Answer:

true because they wanted thier tradition

Answer:

Colonization and Spice/Slave trade gave Europe a massive advantage over Asia

Explanation:

Answer: One factor that gave European countries an economic advantage in Asia from 1750 to 1900 is that Europeans were far more advanced than Asia, as many countries in Asia, at least the ones considered powerful, had isolationist policies, and resisted Western influence. This led to China and Japan, countries with a lot of resources and economic influence, missing the industrial revolution entirely and becoming far behind the West technologically. This allowed European countries to easily defeat Asian countries and expand their influence in the region, and acquire resources from these countries. They used their superior military strength to open more ports in China and Japan so they could trade with the region more efficiently. European countries such as Britain imported opium into China as to control them, and to simply have a good that they could trade with them, as China didn’t have a need for any European goods. Getting the Chinese addicted to these powerful drugs made the demand for it increase, and European countries were able to gain influence in the region, and gain an economic advantage.

I got an 85% for this, so it's not absolutely perfect, if you have anything to add to this feel free to say something in the comments

Answer:

B Asia

Explanation:

Answer:

C is the answer

Explanation:

They wanted to claim new land to expand their empires. France also wanted to spread Christianity and find a new route by water to the East through North America.

Answer:

General Andrew Jackson

Explanation:

Two weeks after the War of 1812 officially ended with the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, U.S. General Andrew Jackson achieves the greatest American victory of the war at the Battle of New Orleans.

Answer:

Cutting taxes reduces government revenues,at lease in the short term, and creates either a budget deficit or increased sovereign debt. The natural countermeasure would be to cut spending.

or...

Lowering the income tax would definitely help raise funds for local governments without hurting any other revenue stream because local governments don’t collect income taxes. With lower income taxes, there is more money for each family to spend and more opportunities for local governments to collect sales tax. State Government: Revenue is gained and lost in for state governments. Money is lost if the income tax is reduced, because the states do collect income taxes. However, states also collect the bulk of the sales tax, and the more money that consumers get to keep, the more money they’ll spend buying products that can be taxed. Federal Government: This move would be bad for the federal government’s revenue stream. Lowering the income tax means less revenue coming into the federal government, and the federal government does not collect sales taxes.

Explanation:

Answer:

Cutting taxes reduces government revenues,at lease in the short term, and creates either a budget deficit or increased sovereign debt. The natural countermeasure would be to cut spending.

or...

Lowering the income tax would definitely help raise funds for local governments without hurting any other revenue stream because local governments don’t collect income taxes. With lower income taxes, there is more money for each family to spend and more opportunities for local governments to collect sales tax. State Government: Revenue is gained and lost in for state governments. Money is lost if the income tax is reduced, because the states do collect income taxes. However, states also collect the bulk of the sales tax, and the more money that consumers get to keep, the more money they’ll spend buying products that can be taxed. Federal Government: This move would be bad for the federal government’s revenue stream. Lowering the income tax means less revenue coming into the federal government, and the federal government does not collect sales taxes.

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The Key disagreements and solutions are:

1.  Representation in Congress: here there were disagreements on how to elect the members of the congress and the number of representatives each states will have. The issues were resolved by agreeing to one Representation for every 30,000 white citizens, plus 3/5 of its slave population, voted directly by the people. Also, each state will have 2 representatives in the senate selected by each state legislative.

2.  Power of the executive: the issues here was on the power given to President, particularly on veto power and the number of years to use per term. The agreement was 4 years per term with no limit on number re-election. Also, veto power was given to president but subject to override. Another issue is on how to vote for president. The agreement is to be based on electors (senators) from each state who would vote “in such manner” as its legislature might “direct.”

3.  Issue of slave trade: the issue is on whether slavery should continue or abolished. They agreed that no law could be passed to ban the slave trade until 1808.

4.  Inclusion of Bill of Rights: here the issue is on the power given to national government which may voilates the rights of individuals and states. They finally agreed on inclusion of Bill of Rights which has 10 amendments.

Answer:

for the name of all things holy, use this for reference and DO NOT COPY WORD FOR WORD (got 100 on Edge btw)

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation were written to help govern the colonies, but it would soon be realized that these would not be sufficient. The federal government had minimal power over the people as the majority of it was allotted to the state governments. The idea was to write a Constitution to help solve some of the many issues that began to arise under the Articles of Confederation. The federal government could not impose taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. Issues like inflation, national debt, and the market being flooded by foreign goods were issues that remained unaddressed because the federal government had no power to do anything about them. The drafting of the Constitution was no simple task. It had to meet the needs and standards of all thirteen colonies. Two majorly opposing perspectives were introduced with the publishing of the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. In the Virginia Plan, there was the proposal of a representation based on the population and a bicameral Congress. The Virginia Plan was mainly supported by large or growing states because of the advantages that would be offered by a representation based on their population. In the New Jersey Plan, a unicameral Congress was proposed and so was the idea that every state should have the same number of representatives. Smaller states tended to support the New Jersey Plan because then they would have an even playing ground when it came to governmental representation. The Great Compromise would ultimately combine certain aspects of each plan offered at the Grand (Constitutional) Convention. The Great Compromise decided on a two-house Congress, representation in one house based on population, and equal representation in the second house. Another big debate arose when it came to deciding how slaves would factor into population. The northerners tended to argue that slaves should not count at all when determining representation in the House of Representatives, but since southerners had a higher slave population, counting the slaves into their population would offer a big advantage in their representation. The Three-Fifths Compromise would eventually be approves, which would state that slaves would each count as three-fifths of a person. This series of compromises would lead to a much better functioning government than there was under the Articles of Confederation.

Answer:35

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

just took the quiz got 100

in my opinion registering to vote is hard.

reason one: hard to decide who to vote for

reason two: some may don't know how to vote.

reason three: some don't know how to do the "online voting"

(keep in mind this is my opinon)

if i could change one thing about voting, maybe it would be how its done. instead of voting for the person maybe we should vote for their beliefs and how they are going to change the world for the better. like how are they going to stop the police killing innocent lives, how are they going to keep the corona cases down, etc.

Answer:

14

Explanation:

because back then they thought they were old enough to bare children and be a house wife

Answer: A: The concept that everyone can complete in the marketplace

Explanation:

Answer:

the Royal Proclamation of 1763

After Britain won the Seven Years' War and gained land in North America, it issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited American colonists from settling west of Appalachia.

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

No two governments, past or present, are exactly the same.

However, it is possible to examine the similarities and differences among political and economic systems and categorize different forms of government. One simple way to categorize governments is to divide them into democratic and authoritarian political systems.

Answer:

B. Five would put them at risk of being charged as an adult, Depending on their crimes.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

D. Seven

I love studying