Plz help!!!!! Need theses as soon as possible. No links plz!!!!

Answer:

A.1 B.2 E.5 F.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps brainliest awnser pls

Answer:

5/8

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4÷2/5=1/4×5/2=5/8 barrel/Hour

Answer:

[tex]^{-1}/_{5}x-7y[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Our equation is

[tex](^{3}/_{5}-5y)-(^{4}/_{5}+2y)[/tex]

now we distribute the - and we get

[tex]^{3}/_{5}-5y-^{4}/_{5}-2y[/tex]

[tex]Combine[/tex] [tex]like[/tex] [tex]terms[/tex]

and now we have [tex]^{-1}/_{5}x-7y[/tex]

Answer:

(1+y)^(3/2)-3(1+y)^(1/2)=(1+x)^(3/2)-3(1+x)^(1/2)+c

Step-by-step explanation:

This is separable.

Multiply x dx on both sides and divide both sides by (1+y)^(1/2) to obtain:

y/(1+y)^(1/2)=(1+x)^(-1/2) x dx

Using law of exponents to get rid of negative exponent by finding reciprocal:

y/(1+y)^(1/2)=x/(1+x)^(1/2) dx

Let u=(1+y)^(1/2).

Then u^2=1+y.

Differentiate: 2 u du=dy

[Let v=(1+x)^(1/2).]

Plug in our substitution:

(u^2-1) 2u du/u=(v^2-1) 2v dv/v

Simplify:

(u^2-1) 2 du=(v^2-1) 2 dv

Integrate both sides:

(u^3/3-u) 2+L=(v^3/3-v) 2+K

Divide both sides by 2:

u^3/3-u +L/2=v^3/3-v+K/2

K/2-L/2 is just a constant value C:

u^3/3-u=v^3/3-v+C

Use substitution again to put back in terms of x and y:

((1+y)^(1/2))^3/3-(1+y)^(1/2)=((1+x)^(1/2))^3/3-(1+x)^(1/2)+C

Simplify the exponent part a bit:

(1+y)^(3/2)/3-(1+y)^(1/2)=(1+x)^(3/2)/3-(1+x)^(1/2)+C

I don't like the division by 3 so multiply both sides by 3:

(1+y)^(3/2)-3(1+y)^(1/2)=(1+x)^(3/2)-3(1+x)^(1/2)+3C

3C is still just an unknown constant, c.

(1+y)^(3/2)-3(1+y)^(1/2)=(1+x)^(3/2)-3(1+x)^(1/2)+c

We can work with the exponents to simplify our expression, and we will get:

[tex]\sqrt[n]{x^{3n}} = x^3[/tex]

Remember that a root of degree n is equivalent to an exponent of 1/n.

This means that we can rewrite a root of degree n as:

[tex]\sqrt[n]{x} = x^{1/n}[/tex]

Then our expression:

[tex]\sqrt[n]{x^{3n}}[/tex]

Can be rewritten as follows.

[tex]\sqrt[n]{x^{3n}} = (x^{3n}})^{1/n}[/tex]

Now we have the exponent of an exponent, that means that we just need to take the product between the two exponents.

Now we can take the product of the exponents to get.

[tex]\sqrt[n]{x^{3n}} = (x^{3n}})^{1/n} = x^{3n*1/n} = x^3[/tex]

You can see that in the third step the exponents n and 1/n cancell eachother, so we end only with the exponent 3.

That is the expression simplified.

Learn more about exponents at:

https://brainly.com/question/847241

#SPJ1

Answer: It is irrational and equal to 3 times the square root of 2.

Answer:

It is irrational and equal to 3 times the square root of 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

just like the other guy said

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, but like they say in Vegas, you're trying to make your point the hard way.

8 * (8 - 4)              So the distributive property is means remove the brackets.

8*8 - 4*8               What you have done is multiply the numbers on either side of the - sign by 8. It is a good practice NOT to destroy the minus sign just yet.

64 - 32

32                          The answer is 32. That's how the distributive property works

With this question only It might be easier to do what is inside the brackets first. That's making your point the easy way.

8*(8-4) = 8* 4 = 32

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = 1/3x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope - Intercept Form = y = mx + b

y - intercept = b = 2 (point of intersection of the y-axis)

m = slope

Slope = Change in Y/Change In X

You can see that as the graph goes up by 1, it goes to the right 3, so slope = 1/3

Equation : y = mx + b

Equation : y = 1/3x + 2

-Chetan K

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Equation : y = mx + b

Equation : y = 1/3x + 2

Answer:

$2 each

Step-by-step explanation:

$14.50-$4.50=$10.00

10.00/5 games =$2 each

Answer:

7 1/2 inches as a decimal of 1 foot is 0.625ft

Answer:

7 1/2 inches = 0.625 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

7 1/2 inches = 7.5 inches

1 ft = 12 inches

7.5/12 = 0.625

7 1/2 inches = 0.625 ft

Answer:

the scale is balanced both times as shown below.

No scale is shown

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the first partial derivatives of f(x, y):

∂f/∂x = -2 (x - 5) = 10 - 2x

∂f/∂y = -2y

The critical points occur where both derivatives are zero:

10 - 2x = 0   ===>   x = 5

-2y = 0   ===>   y = 0

So there is only critical point at (5, 0), which takes on a value of f(5, 0) = 25.

Compute the Hessian matrix for f :

[tex]H(x, y) = \begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial^2f}{\partial x^2} & \frac{\partial^2f}{\partial x\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial^2f}{\partial y\partial x} & \frac{\partial^2f}{\partial y^2}\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}-2&0\\0&-2\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Since det(H(x, y)) = 4 > 0 for all x, y, the critical point (5, 0) is a relative minimum.

f has no saddle points.

Using conditional probability, it is found that there is a 0.7873 = 78.73% probability that Mona was justifiably dropped.

Conditional Probability

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)}[/tex]

In which

In this problem:

The probability of failing the test is composed by:

Hence:

[tex]P(A) = 0.46(0.37) + 0.63 = 0.8002[/tex]

The probability of both failing the test and being unfit is:

[tex]P(A \cap B) = 0.63[/tex]

Hence, the conditional probability is:

[tex]P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(A)} = \frac{0.63}{0.8002} = 0.7873[/tex]

0.7873 = 78.73% probability that Mona was justifiably dropped.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/14398287

Answer: 4 1/4 hours

Explanation: 2.5 + 1.75 = 4.25

4.25 = 4 1/4

Answer:

a = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so first you do the reciprocal of division which is multiplication. So its gonna be 3/4 x 1/a = 1/4

you multiply the fractions 3/4 x 1/a and get 3/4a = 1/4

then you cross multiply and you get 12=4a

swap sides so its going to be 4a = 12

divide both sides by 4 and you get a = 3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that a proportional relationship is a relationship between two quantities in which the ratio of one quantity to the other quantity is constant. ... When ratios between quantities are not constant, a relationship may be linear but not proportional and the graph does not pass through the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you like my answer than please mark me brainliest thanks

Answer:

uważam że nie wiem ale bym wiedział tylko muszę wiedzieć

Answer:

$9.61 per shirt

Step-by-step explanation:

You take the total cost of $48.05 and divide it by the number of t-shirts which is 5.

48.05/5 = 9.61

Answer:

he  walks at lest 5 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability of obtaining exactly 3 tails is on the tosses is 1/8.

Step-by-step explanation:

P(all tails)= P(nickel tails)P(dime tails)P(quarter tails)

P(all tails)= (1/2)(1/2)(1/2)

P(all tails)= 1/8

Answer:

1221

Step-by-step explanation:

here you go ...........

Answer:

  72 hectares

Step-by-step explanation:

The dimensions of the rectangle on the ground will be 20,000 times the dimensions shown in the drawing:

  20,000×3 cm = 60,000 cm = 600 m

  20,000×6 cm = 120,000 cm = 1200 m

The area of the land is ...

  A = LW = (1200 m)(600 m) = 720,000 m²

1 hectare is 10,000 m², so this is ...

  720,000 m² × (1 ha)/(10,000 m²) = 72 ha

The area of the plot is 72 hectares.

Using the t-distribution, it is found that the 99% confidence interval for the difference is (0.058, 3.462).

We are given the standard deviation for the samples, hence, the t-distribution is used to solve this question.

The standard errors are given by:

[tex]s_A = \frac{1.79}{\sqrt{18}} = 0.4219[/tex]

[tex]s_B = \frac{1.95}{\sqrt{18}} = 0.4596[/tex]

For the distribution of differences, the mean and the standard error are given by:

[tex]\overline{x} = \mu_A - \mu_B = 23.95 - 22.19 = 1.76[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{0.4219^2 + 0.4596^2} = 0.6239[/tex]

The interval is given by:

[tex]\overline{x} \pm ts[/tex]

The critical value for a two-tailed 99% confidence interval with 18 + 18 - 2 = 34 df is t = 2.7284.

Then:

[tex]\overline{x} - ts = 1.76 - 2.7284(0.6239) = 0.058[/tex]

[tex]\overline{x} + ts = 1.76 + 2.7284(0.6239) = 3.462[/tex]

The 99% confidence interval for the difference is (0.058, 3.462).

For more on the t-distribution, you can check https://brainly.com/question/16162795

Answer:

35 degrees celsius

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, I couldn't really tell what the chart looks like, so I am guessing it looks like this:

Sidewalk 1:

x  |  y

2  |  17

0  | 5

Sidewalk 2:

x  |  y

1  |  20

3  | 26

Part a.

Now, we have to write the equation for sidewalk 1 in slope-intercept form.

Slope-intercept form is represented as this: [tex]y=mx+b[/tex], where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Because this is true for all values on the line, we can plug in values of the chart for Sidewalk 1.

[tex]17=2m+b\\5=0m+b[/tex]

Subtracting the second equation from the first, we have

[tex]12=2m[/tex], and [tex]m = 6[/tex].

Now, we can just plug 6 back into the first equation to get:

[tex]17=2(6)+b[/tex]  to get [tex]17 = 12 + b[/tex], and then [tex]b = 5[/tex].

Now, we can just rewrite slope intercept form for Sidewalk 1 to have

[tex]y=6x+5[/tex].

Part b.

Point-slope form is represented as [tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex], where x and y are the coordinates of one point, and x1 and y1 are the coordinates of another point on the line. Because the chart represented for Sidewalk 2 includes a point, namely [tex](1, 20)[/tex] and [tex](3, 26)[/tex], we can plug this in and solve for the slope:

[tex]26-20=m(3-1)[/tex]

This is it in point-slope form. Because the second part of the question asks us to convert to slope-intercept form, we must solve for the slope, or m.

Expanding, we have [tex]26-20=3m-m[/tex]

Combining like terms, we have [tex]6 = 2m[/tex], and then [tex]3 = m[/tex]. Now, we need to plug a point and the slope back into point-slope form, not needing another point. We choose [tex](1, 20)[/tex], even though [tex](3, 26)[/tex] works just as well.

[tex]y-20=3(x-1)[/tex]

Expanding, we have [tex]y-20=3x-3[/tex]

Adding 20 to both sides, we have [tex]y=3x+17[/tex]

Part c. and d.

We see that both equations do not have the same slope, so then they are not parallel, meaning they don't have no solutions. If they have a solution, we can set them equal to each other.

[tex]3x+17=6x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 3x, we have [tex]17=3x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 5, we have [tex]12 = 3x[/tex]

Dividing by 3, we have [tex]x = 4[/tex].

Because there is no x = x, or anything like that, the solution does not have infinite solutions and therefore has one solution, meaning it is consistent independent.

gak bisa bahasa inggris.

Step-by-step explanation:

maap.